Negotiating Cloud Costs: Workload-Specific Tactics

Cloud costs are rising fast, with 30% of budgets wasted on unused resources. But here's the fix: tailor your cloud agreements to specific workloads. Instead of one-size-fits-all contracts, focus on:

• Profiling workloads: Identify critical (e.g., customer-facing apps) vs. non-critical (e.g., testing environments).
• Using the right billing models: Match predictable workloads with Reserved Instances, and flexible tasks with Spot Pricing.
• Custom agreements: Negotiate discounts for heavy usage and define workload-specific SLAs.
• Multi-cloud strategies: Split workloads across providers for cost savings and better deals.
• Regular audits: Monitor usage and eliminate waste, saving up to 30%–50%.

S2 E3- Beyond Lift-and-Shift: The Cloud Cost Maturity Playbook

Understanding Workload Profiles and Their Cost Impact

To negotiate effectively with cloud providers, you need a solid understanding of your workloads and their associated costs. This means looking beyond your monthly bill and diving into how each service uses resources, meets performance demands, and impacts your business.

Did you know that up to 30% of cloud spending goes to waste on idle or underused resources? This happens when businesses apply a generic approach instead of tailoring their strategy to fit specific workload needs. In fact, a 2023 Flexera survey revealed that respondents estimated wasting 28% of their public cloud budgets [5][6].

Workload profiling involves analysing how resources are consumed, understanding performance requirements, and determining the importance of each application to your business. For example, a customer-facing e-commerce platform requires high availability and low latency at all times, while a development environment or periodic data processing task might have more flexible performance and cost needs.

Armed with this level of insight, you can negotiate cloud contracts that are tailored to your needs, cutting out waste and optimising costs. This approach not only saves money but also ensures your agreements align with your business priorities.

Visibility underpins every effective cloud cost strategy. Without it, teams operate in the dark, making decisions without understanding the financial impact. – Steven O'Dwyer, Senior FinOps Specialist, ProsperOps [7]

Identifying Critical and Non-Critical Workloads

The first step in workload profiling is separating your applications into two categories: critical and non-critical. This distinction is key for negotiating contracts that meet your operational needs without overspending.

Critical workloads are those that directly affect revenue, customer experience, or essential operations. Think of your primary website, payment systems, or customer databases. For these, performance and availability are non-negotiable, even if it means paying for premium resources and strict service-level agreements.

Non-critical workloads, on the other hand, include development environments, testing systems, or batch processing jobs. These can tolerate occasional interruptions, making them ideal candidates for cost-saving measures like flexible pricing, spot instances, or scheduled shutdowns.

Beyond criticality, workloads vary in their resource demands. Some are compute-heavy, others require significant storage, and some need high network throughput. For example, a machine learning training task might need powerful GPUs for short bursts, while a backup system may demand substantial storage with minimal compute power.

To categorise workloads effectively:

• Set strict budgets and enable real-time cost alerts [4]. This helps you identify resource-heavy workloads quickly.
• Conduct regular audits to find and eliminate unused resources [3].
• Schedule shutdowns for non-critical resources during off-hours [3].
• Assess your storage needs and use different storage classes to optimise costs [4].

Using Historical and Projected Usage Data

Historical data is a powerful tool for negotiating cloud contracts. It provides clear evidence of your actual usage patterns, helping you secure agreements that reflect your needs accurately.

Analysing historical data reveals patterns, seasonality, and growth trends. For instance, retail businesses often see traffic spikes during the holidays, while B2B companies may experience quieter weekends. Understanding these trends allows you to plan contracts that scale with your business cycles [7].

Trend analysis also helps identify anomalies and prepare for capacity changes [7]. For example, if a data processing workload consistently operates near capacity, you might negotiate a higher tier. On the flip side, if resources are underused, you can explore more flexible options.

To dig deeper into costs and usage:

• Use cost allocation tags to track spending by department, project, or team [7]. This helps pinpoint the most expensive workloads and allocate resources wisely.
• Collect usage and billing reports from your cloud provider's console [7]. These reports highlight peak usage times, underutilised resources, and key cost drivers.
• Employ machine learning tools to spot anomalies and inefficiencies [8]. These tools analyse usage patterns and flag unusual consumption, which might indicate misconfigurations.
• Map cloud costs to specific business outcomes using precise tagging [7]. For example, showing that a workload generates £X in revenue against a cost of £Y strengthens your case during negotiations.

For businesses using multiple cloud providers, consolidating and normalising reports is essential [7]. Different providers use varying metrics and billing structures, so standardising these insights ensures consistency.

Lastly, evaluate your commitment coverage, utilisation rates, and effective savings [7]. If you’re consistently using reserved instances at 90% capacity, you might negotiate better rates for additional commitments. Conversely, if utilisation is low, switching to flexible pricing models could be more effective.

Choosing the Right Billing Models for Different Workloads

To optimise costs without sacrificing performance, it’s essential to align your billing models with the specific characteristics of your workloads. Cloud providers offer a range of pricing options tailored to different usage patterns and business needs. By matching the right model to each workload, you can significantly reduce expenses.

Take AWS, for example. Reserved Instances can cut costs by up to 72% compared to on-demand rates [12], while Spot Instances offer savings of up to 90% [9]. However, these savings only become a reality when the chosen model meets the workload’s unique requirements.

Comparing Billing Models: Pay-As-You-Go, Reserved Instances, and Spot Pricing

A clear understanding of each billing model’s pros and cons is vital for making informed decisions during contract negotiations. Each model serves a different purpose, depending on your workload and business scenario.

• Pay-as-you-go (On-Demand):
  This model provides unbeatable flexibility, charging by the hour or second with no upfront commitment. It’s perfect for unpredictable or short-lived workloads, though its per-unit costs are higher compared to other options.

• Reserved Instances (RIs):
  Reserved Instances require a fixed-term commitment in exchange for substantial discounts. Standard RIs offer the greatest cost reductions but come with limited flexibility. Convertible RIs, on the other hand, allow you to adjust instance types during the term, making them a better fit for workloads that might evolve over time [11].

• Spot Pricing:
  Spot Instances let you bid on spare capacity at heavily discounted rates. While interruptions can occur with little notice - usually within 30 seconds to two minutes [9] - interruptions happen less than 5% of the time on average [10].

Choosing the right model depends on factors like workload predictability, criticality, and tolerance for interruptions. For instance, a customer-facing web app would typically require the reliability of on-demand or reserved instances, while a data processing task could leverage the cost efficiency of Spot Instances.

Matching Billing Models to Predictable and Variable Workloads

Once you understand the billing models, the next step is to align them with your workloads, whether predictable or variable. This requires analysing usage patterns, performance needs, and the overall impact on your business.

Predictable workloads - those with steady resource consumption, like production databases or web servers with consistent traffic - are ideal for Reserved Instances. However, accurate usage forecasts are crucial, as unused resources can offset any savings. When negotiating Reserved Instance agreements, consider workload stability and potential growth. Standard RIs offer the best discounts but are less flexible, while Convertible RIs trade slightly lower savings for adaptability to changing needs.

Variable workloads demand a more flexible approach. Applications with fluctuating traffic, seasonal demand spikes, or irregular usage may benefit from on-demand pricing, despite its higher per-unit cost. For workloads that can handle interruptions - like development environments, batch processing, or data analysis - Spot Instances are an excellent choice, provided they’re designed to be stateless and fault-tolerant.

Hybrid strategies often yield the best results. For example, you could use Reserved Instances to cover baseline capacity and supplement with on-demand or Spot Instances during peak periods. This approach balances cost predictability for consistent usage with the flexibility to handle surges.

Real-world examples illustrate the power of aligning billing models with workload characteristics. Skyscanner, for instance, reportedly covered a year’s worth of licence costs in just two weeks by using tools that provide detailed cost visibility [13]. Similarly, Validity achieved a 90% reduction in cost management overhead by aligning workloads with the most suitable billing models [13].

When transitioning workloads between billing models, careful planning is key. Evaluate workload predictability and tolerance for disruption, and consider implementing cost anomaly detection to monitor spending and catch unexpected changes. Cultivating a cost-aware mindset across teams helps ensure that technical decisions align with financial goals.

Next, take a closer look at how these models can be applied to your predictable and variable workloads.

Negotiating Custom Agreements for Specific Workloads

Standard cloud contracts often fall short when it comes to meeting the unique demands of specific workloads. If your business relies on precise performance benchmarks or consumes substantial resources, custom agreements can make all the difference. These tailored contracts help you achieve better pricing, enhanced support, and service levels that align closely with your operational needs.

The key to successful custom agreements lies in understanding your workloads inside and out. By mapping your data flow and usage patterns, you can ensure that contract terms reflect your actual requirements [14].

Securing Discounts for High-Consumption Workloads

If your workloads involve high resource consumption, you’re in a strong position to negotiate. Cloud providers value customers who demonstrate consistent, large-scale usage and a commitment to long-term partnerships. Highlighting your growth trajectory and future needs can help you secure custom discounts [15].

Detailed cost data - broken down by customer, team, or service - can be a powerful tool in these negotiations. This level of insight allows you to push for service-specific pricing on high-demand resources like compute, storage, and database services [13][15].

Focusing on resource-heavy business units can also strengthen your case. For instance, teams working on generative AI applications often require substantial compute power, making them ideal candidates for custom discount agreements [16]. Providers are more likely to offer favourable terms for predictable, high-volume usage.

Adding flexibility to your commitments can further improve your negotiating position. Consider requesting features like rollover credits for unused resources, gradual scaling periods, or the option to adjust resource types within your agreement. These elements protect your investment while reassuring providers of your long-term usage plans [17]. Beyond monetary discounts, you might also negotiate for perks like dedicated Technical Account Managers, priority support, or funding for proof-of-concept projects - benefits that can significantly enhance your operations [17].

Requesting Workload-Specific SLAs and Contract Terms

Standard service level agreements (SLAs) often fail to address the precise performance needs of critical workloads. Custom SLAs, on the other hand, allow you to define specific performance thresholds based on your operational metrics and domain knowledge [1]. For mission-critical applications, it’s worth negotiating stricter SLAs with higher availability targets and more rigorous performance guarantees [15].

Financial accountability is another important aspect. Including financial penalty clauses for SLA breaches ensures accountability and provides compensation if service standards aren’t met [15]. When negotiating, it’s often wise to start with non-price terms like custom SLAs before moving on to pricing discussions [14].

For workloads that handle sensitive data, clear terms around data ownership and security are essential. Your agreement should specify data residency requirements, ownership rights, and security responsibilities, while also ensuring compliance with industry regulations [2].

Standard vs Custom Agreements Comparison

Custom agreements are particularly advantageous for businesses with significant cloud spending or specific performance requirements. However, they demand precise forecasting and early involvement from finance teams [15]. The benefits, both in cost savings and service quality, often outweigh the extra effort.

Planning an exit strategy is equally important. Negotiating clear terms for data migration and exit clauses can help you avoid vendor lock-in while still benefiting from a tailored agreement [2]. Whether you choose standard or custom contracts will ultimately depend on your workload needs and business goals.

For help tailoring your cloud agreements, contact Hokstad Consulting.

Next, we’ll explore how multi-cloud and hybrid strategies can further reduce your costs.

Using Multi-Cloud and Hybrid Strategies for Cost Reduction

Relying on a single cloud vendor can limit flexibility and bargaining power. By adopting multi-cloud and hybrid cloud strategies, businesses can better align workloads with the most cost-effective environments while improving their position in vendor negotiations.

A multi-cloud strategy involves using multiple public cloud providers, whereas a hybrid cloud approach combines private infrastructure with public cloud services. Both aim to reduce costs by placing workloads in environments where they perform best at the lowest possible cost.

Interestingly, 83% of businesses report that using a multi-cloud setup improves their negotiation power and flexibility with cloud providers [19]. This is largely because distributing workloads across multiple vendors avoids over-reliance on a single provider and opens up opportunities for better deals.

Matching Workloads to the Right Cloud Environments

Not all cloud providers are created equal - each has its strengths. Some excel in areas like artificial intelligence, while others shine in high-performance computing [22]. Choosing where to place workloads should be based on performance needs and cost considerations. For example, CPU-heavy applications might benefit from providers with strong compute capabilities, while data-intensive workloads could find cost savings with vendors offering optimised storage pricing. Compliance requirements are another key factor, as workloads involving sensitive data may need to remain in private clouds or specific geographic locations.

Let your workload be your guide – Flexential [23]

Cost analysis is critical. In 2023, businesses spent an average of 14% of their IT budgets on public cloud storage services to optimise workload placement [21]. This trend highlights the growing understanding that strategic workload distribution can lead to meaningful savings.

Latency is another crucial consideration. Applications that require real-time processing may need to be located near specific data centres, while batch processing tasks can tolerate higher latency in exchange for lower costs. By carefully analysing workload characteristics, businesses can determine which setups - multi-cloud or hybrid - are most suitable [21].

To streamline cost management, implement a consistent tagging strategy across all cloud environments. This makes it easier to track and allocate costs to specific teams, projects, or applications, helping to identify areas for further optimisation [24].

By distributing workloads strategically, businesses can conduct more effective cost and performance reviews.

Leveraging Multi-Cloud Portfolios in Negotiations

One of the biggest advantages of a multi-cloud strategy is how it changes your negotiating position. Instead of being tied to one vendor’s pricing, you can compare providers and move workloads based on which offers the best combination of cost and performance.

This flexibility is especially useful during contract renewals. Knowing that you have alternatives, providers are more likely to offer competitive pricing and better terms. A multi-cloud setup strengthens your hand in these discussions, allowing you to secure deals that align with your needs [18].

That said, there’s a trade-off. While multi-cloud reduces reliance on a single provider, it can also dilute your negotiating power with individual vendors because your overall spend with each one is smaller [20]. The key is to balance workload distribution - maintaining enough usage with key providers to qualify for volume discounts while still retaining the ability to shift workloads as needed.

Most importantly, they provide flexibility and choice. They allow businesses to select the best cloud solution for each workload or application. – Scott Petry, cloud and digital services principal with PwC US [20]

This approach ensures businesses can access the right services at the right price [19]. It also broadens the range of options, aligning costs with actual requirements rather than being constrained by vendor limitations.

If your organisation already has enterprise agreements with multiple providers, you can strategically allocate workloads to optimise both performance and budget [18]. Existing relationships can also be leveraged to negotiate better terms.

When implementing a multi-cloud strategy, focus on selecting the right mix of providers and negotiating pricing based on the needs of each workload type [20]. This ensures you’re not just spreading risk but actively managing costs across your infrastructure.

For those navigating multi-cloud setups, Hokstad Consulting offers expert advice on hybrid cloud configurations and strategic cloud migration.

Continuing to monitor and manage costs will help maximise the benefits of these strategies.

Continuous Review and Cloud Cost Management

Once you've negotiated workload-specific agreements, the next step is ensuring they stay relevant. Cloud usage evolves quickly, and what seemed cost-effective a few months ago might now be draining your budget. Regular reviews help you avoid unnecessary expenses and keep your pricing competitive.

Without consistent monitoring, businesses often end up paying for unused resources or miss out on better pricing options. Take the example of a mid-sized software company: they discovered they were underestimating their cloud expenses by 30% every quarter. Their auto-scaling groups expanded during traffic peaks but failed to scale back down, leaving them with £45,000 in unused compute costs each quarter [25]. By fine-tuning their auto-scaling settings, improving monitoring, and setting up automated alerts, they not only saved £45,000 per quarter but also strengthened collaboration between their finance and engineering teams [25]. This shows that managing costs isn't just about cutting expenses - it’s about creating systems that prevent waste from building up. Let’s explore how regular audits and precise metrics can help drive this efficiency.

Setting Up Regular Cloud Cost Audits

A cloud cost audit is a systematic way to identify inefficiencies and optimise spending across your cloud infrastructure. These audits can uncover resources that are idle, underutilised, or forgotten - resources that may still be racking up charges without contributing to your goals [6]. During an audit, you’ll want to examine usage across services, instances, and departments. Check for accurate tagging to ensure resources are properly categorised, and compare current usage with historical trends to spot anomalies or unexpected spikes [6].

Setting a regular audit schedule ensures inefficiencies are caught early. Share the findings through internal reports or dashboards so stakeholders can easily track progress and address problem areas [6]. To save time and gain real-time insights, automate parts of the process with tools like AWS Cost Explorer or SolarWinds® Observability SaaS. For instance, you can schedule weekly automated scans to flag idle virtual machines, unattached volumes, outdated backups, unused Elastic IP addresses, or zombie containers [6].

Defining clear criteria for idle resources is crucial. For example, you might label a resource as idle if its CPU usage stays below 5% for seven consecutive days [25]. Once these criteria are in place, automating the removal of inactive resources - especially in non-production environments where unused test instances often linger - can significantly cut costs [25]. With regular audits, you’ll have the insights needed to make informed decisions about rightsizing and governance [6].

But audits are just one piece of the puzzle. To truly optimise costs, tracking the right metrics is essential.

Tracking Metrics for Data-Driven Renegotiations

Negotiating better deals requires solid data. Studies show that enterprises waste nearly 30% of their cloud spending, and 72% of decision-makers reported budget overruns last year [26]. As management expert Peter Drucker famously said:

What gets measured gets managed [29].

Start by focusing on key financial metrics. Monitor cloud resource utilisation rates to identify underused resources, and calculate the percentage of cloud waste to uncover potential savings. Cost allocation - tying expenses to specific departments - can simplify budget discussions and help identify where costs are coming from [26]. Tracking unit costs lets you evaluate efficiency over time, while analysing the proportion of spending benefiting from discounts can highlight additional savings opportunities. Keeping an eye on spending variances can also reveal areas where cost control needs improvement [26].

Operational metrics provide further clarity. Total cloud spend helps you pinpoint major cost drivers and ensure you’re sticking to your budget. Efficiency metrics, like resource utilisation and cost per transaction, show whether your investments are delivering value [27].

Performance metrics shouldn’t be overlooked either. Monitor CPU usage to ensure your compute resources are properly scaled, track memory usage to avoid performance issues, and watch disk I/O to prevent bottlenecks in data-heavy applications [28]. Network and reliability metrics - such as bandwidth, latency, requests per minute, and error rates - can quickly identify potential problems [28].

For example, Accrete, an enterprise AI firm, managed to cut its AWS costs by 40–45% by transitioning Amazon EC2 instances to containers and leveraging Kubecost’s cost monitoring tools [26]. A consolidated dashboard that tracks these metrics not only highlights trends but also strengthens your position during renegotiations. When vendors see how your usage has evolved and which workloads deliver the most value, you’re better equipped to negotiate favourable terms.

For organisations aiming to implement a robust cloud cost management strategy, Hokstad Consulting offers services to help cut expenses by 30–50% through systematic auditing and optimisation.

Conclusion: Achieving Cost Efficiency with Workload-Specific Tactics

To manage cloud costs effectively, focusing on workloads is key. Align pricing models with the nature of your workloads - whether they're predictable, variable, or mission-critical.

Once you've analysed your workloads, choose pricing models that suit their actual usage patterns. For example, use reserved instances for steady, predictable tasks, spot pricing for fault-tolerant operations, and explore multi-cloud options to tap into cost-efficient environments. Pairing these strategies with smart workload placement can make a big difference.

Regular monitoring and cost audits are crucial. As Saad Saleem explains:

FinOps provides a framework where finance, operations, and technology teams collaborate, giving organisations the transparency and control needed to manage cloud costs effectively. [30]

This collaboration ensures that workload-specific agreements stay relevant as your business grows. Regular audits can uncover inefficiencies, and setting policies for consistent reviews and open communication keeps everything on track. Establishing strict budgets and clear resource usage criteria allows teams to respond quickly if overspending occurs [31]. This proactive approach ensures your cloud agreements adapt to meet your evolving needs.

For organisations looking to implement workload-specific cost strategies, Hokstad Consulting offers expertise in workload analysis and optimisation. Their methods can help reduce costs by 30–50%, aligning resources with cost-efficient, high-performance cloud setups.

FAQs