Dynamic traffic splitting allows businesses to deploy new software versions without disrupting users. By gradually routing traffic between the old and new versions, it reduces risk, ensures reliability, and enables quick rollbacks if issues arise. This approach is particularly important for UK businesses, where downtime can cost over £10,000 per hour and strict SLAs demand near-perfect availability.
Key Points:
- What it is: A deployment method that splits user traffic between application versions, enabling staged rollouts.
- Why it matters: Minimises downtime, reduces deployment risk, and supports compliance with UK regulations like GDPR.
- How it works: Uses tools like load balancers, health checks, and CI/CD pipelines to manage traffic and monitor performance.
- Benefits: Fast rollbacks, reduced user impact, and improved deployment reliability.
- Challenges: Higher complexity, resource overhead, and the need for robust automation and monitoring.
This method is especially useful in DevOps workflows, leveraging automation to streamline updates while maintaining service continuity. For UK organisations, dynamic traffic splitting ensures updates align with customer expectations and regulatory standards.
AWS re:Invent 2020: Share the road with traffic splitting and shared load balancers
Requirements for Zero Downtime Deployment
Achieving zero downtime during deployments demands meticulous preparation. Without the right components in place, deployments can disrupt user experiences. By understanding these technical essentials, you can lay the groundwork for smooth, dynamic traffic splitting.
Basic Requirements for Zero Downtime
Four core elements are crucial for successful zero downtime deployments: stateless services, load balancers, automated deployment pipelines, and comprehensive health checks. Each plays a vital role in ensuring seamless transitions between application versions.
Stateless services are at the heart of this architecture. By externalising session data, services avoid relying on in-memory storage. This can be achieved by storing session data in external systems like Redis or DynamoDB, using JWT tokens for client-side state management, or opting for database-backed sessions instead of in-memory alternatives [5].
Load balancers are essential for directing traffic based on server health and capacity. They provide the flexibility to implement various traffic splitting strategies. Tools such as NGINX Plus and AWS Application Load Balancer are commonly used for this purpose, offering robust support for dynamic traffic management [5].
Automated deployment pipelines eliminate manual errors and bottlenecks. These pipelines should include version control for both code and configuration, automated health checks, and integration with monitoring tools for real-time feedback. Tools like Jenkins and GitLab CI/CD are popular for orchestrating these workflows [8].
To ensure resilience, the architecture must include redundancy, with at least two healthy delivery paths. This could involve using multiple environments, content delivery networks (CDNs), or geographically distributed regions, ensuring that failures in one path do not impact users [2].
These components work together to enable dynamic traffic splitting, a key strategy for achieving zero downtime during deployments.
Using Readiness and Liveness Probes
Once the foundation is in place, health checks become critical for validating deployment readiness.
Readiness probes ensure that an instance is fully prepared to handle requests. These checks verify dependencies such as database connections, external APIs, and internal service readiness. Only after all readiness checks pass does the load balancer start routing traffic to the new instance.
Liveness probes, on the other hand, monitor an application's ongoing responsiveness. They detect situations where an application might still be running but has become unresponsive or stuck. If a liveness probe fails, the system can automatically restart the affected instance.
In UK cloud environments, Kubernetes deployments often use HTTP requests to designated health check endpoints. For example, an HTTP GET request to /health/ready might be used for readiness checks, while /health/live could handle liveness monitoring. Traffic is routed only to pods that pass both checks, ensuring smooth transitions during updates [7].
A best practice is to perform health checks from multiple regions. This helps distinguish between genuine application failures and local network issues, reducing the risk of false positives that could trigger unnecessary rollbacks [2].
These probes integrate seamlessly with dynamic traffic splitting, ensuring that only healthy instances handle user requests during a deployment.
UK Compliance and Service Expectations
In addition to technical considerations, UK businesses must address regulatory and service expectations.
Data privacy regulations, particularly UK GDPR, require businesses to maintain strict control over data processing during deployments. This means ensuring user data remains secure and accessible throughout the process, with no lapses in data protection. Deployment strategies must include safeguards to prevent data exposure or loss during version transitions [3].
Customer expectations in the UK are high when it comes to service availability. British consumers demand consistent, reliable service, and even brief outages can lead to customer churn and reputational damage. In such a competitive market, businesses cannot afford planned downtime or maintenance windows.
Service level agreements (SLAs) often mandate availability targets of 99.99% or higher, equating to less than 53 minutes of downtime annually. Meeting these stringent requirements necessitates robust deployment strategies capable of handling updates without interrupting service [2].
While the additional infrastructure required for zero downtime deployments can increase costs, the benefits - such as reduced downtime and improved customer satisfaction - often outweigh the expense. Cost-effective cloud services, resource optimisation, and phased deployment strategies can help balance these needs.
Key metrics for evaluating deployment success include uptime percentages, mean time to recovery (MTTR), and mean time between failures (MTBF). Monitoring user experience and feedback also provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of deployment strategies [2][3].
| Deployment Strategy | Rollback Speed | Resource Overhead | Complexity | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue-Green | Instant | High | Moderate | Mission-critical, fast rollback |
| Canary/Traffic Splitting | Gradual | Moderate | High | Risk-averse, staged rollout |
| Rolling Update | Moderate | Low | Low | Standard, less critical systems |
The choice of deployment strategy depends on balancing these factors against specific business needs and regulatory requirements. For UK organisations prioritising reliability, the added complexity and cost of advanced traffic splitting approaches are often justified.
How Dynamic Traffic Splitting Works
Dynamic traffic splitting is an essential technique for distributing user requests across different application versions, ensuring uninterrupted service while testing under live conditions. It relies on weighted routing algorithms to dynamically adjust traffic distribution. This approach allows for precise control during deployments, enabling gradual transitions that minimise risk and maintain reliability.
Traffic Splitting Methods
Several methods are used for dynamic traffic splitting, each tailored to specific deployment needs. Here’s a closer look at three key approaches:
Canary Deployments
This method starts cautiously by directing a small proportion of users - typically 5% - to the new version, while the majority (95%) continue using the stable release. If the initial phase performs well, the traffic allocation gradually increases to 10%, 25%, 50%, and eventually 100%. This staged rollout helps limit exposure to potential issues. If problems like increased error rates or slower response times arise, the process can be paused or reversed, protecting most users from disruptions [8].
Blue-Green Deployments
In this method, two identical environments - Blue (current) and Green (new) - are maintained. Initially, all traffic flows to the Blue environment, while the Green environment is updated. Once the new version is validated, traffic is switched entirely to the Green environment using a load balancer or DNS update. This switch happens instantaneously, offering the fastest rollback option. Should issues arise, traffic can be redirected back to the Blue environment within seconds. However, this method requires higher infrastructure costs since both environments must run simultaneously [3][4].
Rolling Deployments
This approach updates application instances incrementally. Traffic is gradually shifted to updated instances as they pass health checks, while older instances are replaced. Rolling deployments strike a balance between resource efficiency and control, making them particularly well-suited for Kubernetes environments. Each pod is updated and tested before rejoining the traffic pool, ensuring a smooth transition [7].
Real-Time Monitoring Requirements
Dynamic traffic splitting depends heavily on robust monitoring systems that can detect and respond to issues almost instantly. These systems track a wide range of metrics to support automated decision-making during deployments.
Application Health Metrics
Metrics like response times, error rates, and throughput provide immediate feedback on how the new version performs under real-world conditions. For example, a spike in HTTP 500 errors or a noticeable increase in response times signals potential issues that need immediate attention [2][8].
User Experience Indicators
Beyond technical metrics, user experience data - such as conversion rates, page load times, and engagement patterns - offers insights into how the update impacts users. A version might perform well technically but still degrade the user experience, which can only be identified through behavioural analysis.
Automated Thresholds and Alerts
Monitoring systems should include automated thresholds to trigger rollbacks or pause deployments when pre-defined limits are breached. For instance, if error rates exceed 0.5% for critical applications, the system can act without waiting for human intervention, ensuring a swift response [2][8].
Geographic Monitoring
For organisations serving users in multiple regions, it's crucial to monitor performance across different locations. This helps distinguish between genuine application issues and localised network problems. Comprehensive geographic monitoring ensures that load balancers and traffic management tools make accurate routing decisions during deployments.
Load Balancers and Traffic Management Tools
Modern load balancers are at the heart of dynamic traffic splitting, enabling precise routing and seamless deployments.
NGINX Plus
This platform offers weighted routing, allowing fine-tuned traffic distribution. Its health checks ensure that only healthy instances receive traffic, and configuration updates can be applied without interrupting service [5].
AWS Application Load Balancer
Ideal for cloud environments, this tool supports weighted target groups, making it a strong choice for canary and blue-green deployments. It integrates with AWS services like CloudWatch to automate traffic adjustments based on health metrics [5].
HAProxy
Favoured for on-premises and hybrid setups, HAProxy provides flexibility and high performance. It distributes traffic based on factors like server capacity and response times, with a detailed statistics interface for monitoring [5].
Kubernetes Ingress Controllers and Service Meshes
These tools, such as Istio, offer built-in traffic splitting capabilities for containerised applications. They adjust traffic distribution based on pod health and readiness checks, seamlessly integrating deployment and traffic management processes [7].
Cloudflare
Cloudflare provides global load balancing, enabling traffic routing across data centres or cloud regions. It supports not only version-based traffic splitting but also geographic and performance-based routing to optimise user experience [5].
A layered approach often works best. For example, Cloudflare might handle global traffic distribution, AWS Application Load Balancer could manage regional routing, and Kubernetes Service Mesh would manage fine-grained traffic splitting between application versions. Together, these tools create a robust ecosystem for traffic management, ensuring smooth deployments even in complex scenarios.
Need help optimizing your cloud costs?
Get expert advice on how to reduce your cloud expenses without sacrificing performance.
Tools and Automation for Dynamic Traffic Splitting
Dynamic traffic splitting thrives when paired with the right tools and automation. For UK businesses, managing traffic effectively while maintaining reliability is essential, especially in today’s fast-paced digital landscape.
Common Tools for UK Cloud Environments
NGINX Plus is a popular choice for ensuring smooth traffic management. With features like weighted routing and health checks, it ensures that only healthy instances handle user requests. Its ability to update configurations without service interruptions makes it indispensable for businesses that need to avoid downtime during peak trading periods [5].
AWS Application Load Balancer has become a go-to for many UK organisations leveraging cloud infrastructure. Its Layer 7 routing capabilities, combined with support for weighted target groups, make it ideal for canary and blue-green deployments. The integration with CloudWatch provides real-time monitoring, enabling automated traffic adjustments based on performance metrics [5].
Azure Traffic Manager caters to businesses with multi-region needs, offering DNS-based global traffic management. Its geographic routing ensures compliance with data residency regulations while optimising performance across regions, an important feature for UK organisations [5].
Kubernetes Ingress Controllers are a staple for cloud-native businesses. They provide seamless traffic routing within containerised environments, making them particularly effective for microservices architectures. Their support for rolling updates further enhances their suitability for modern deployment models [7].
DeployHQ, a UK-based deployment tool, offers tailored features for local businesses, including GBP billing. Its atomic deployments and instant symlink switching enable zero downtime, while built-in rollback capabilities and server group support ensure scalability [6].
Automation Best Practices
Automation plays a critical role in dynamic traffic splitting, and a few best practices can ensure smoother operations:
Infrastructure as Code (IaC) allows teams to define load balancers, routing rules, and deployment environments programmatically. This eliminates configuration drift, ensures consistency, and makes rollbacks predictable [8].
CI/CD Pipeline Integration transforms traffic splitting into an automated process, reducing the potential for human error. These pipelines can dynamically adjust traffic weights, monitor deployment health, and trigger rollbacks when needed [8].
Automated Rollback Mechanisms act as a safety net, continuously monitoring key metrics like error rates and response times. If thresholds are breached, traffic is instantly redirected to a stable version, ensuring service continuity [6].
Health Check Integration ensures readiness and liveness probes are automated, preventing users from being directed to services not ready to handle requests [7].
By combining these practices, teams can create an automated ecosystem where infrastructure and deployment processes are version-controlled, consistent, and repeatable. These methods form the backbone of tailored solutions offered by experts like Hokstad Consulting.
Hokstad Consulting's Approach
Hokstad Consulting leverages these automation principles to streamline deployment cycles for UK businesses. By eliminating manual bottlenecks, they enable faster and more reliable software releases.
For example, they helped a tech startup slash deployment times from 6 hours to just 20 minutes by implementing automated CI/CD pipelines and DevOps practices. This allowed the team to focus on innovation rather than deployment logistics [1].
Their clients often report dramatic improvements, including up to 75% faster deployments and 90% fewer errors. These results are achieved through automated CI/CD pipelines, Infrastructure as Code, and comprehensive monitoring solutions. Additionally, their approach has led to a 95% reduction in infrastructure-related downtime, thanks to dynamic traffic splitting, automated health monitoring, and instant rollback capabilities [1].
Hokstad Consulting tailors its solutions to meet the unique needs of UK businesses, addressing compliance requirements while optimising costs. Their expertise spans public, private, and hybrid cloud environments, ensuring traffic management aligns with both regulatory standards and operational goals.
Benefits, Challenges, and Best Practices
This section delves into the advantages, limitations, and effective strategies for dynamic traffic splitting. While this approach offers plenty of benefits, it also introduces complexities. By understanding both sides, organisations can make well-informed decisions about its implementation.
Benefits and Challenges
Dynamic traffic splitting comes with trade-offs that directly influence zero-downtime deployment strategies. Here's a breakdown of the benefits and challenges:
| Benefit | Challenge |
|---|---|
| Reduced deployment risk – Gradual rollouts limit the impact of potential failures | Increased architectural complexity – Requires careful setup and configuration |
| Fast rollback capability – Traffic can be instantly switched back to stable versions | Higher resource overhead – Parallel environments can drive up costs |
| Real-time monitoring – Enables live tracking of new release performance | Automation requirements – Needs robust observability tools |
| Minimal user disruption – Updates are seamless for end users | Potential for misconfiguration – Complex routing rules may lead to errors |
| Compliance with SLAs – Meets strict UK service availability standards | Cost considerations – Additional infrastructure and tooling expenses |
Interestingly, organisations leveraging automated health checks and real-time monitoring have reported achieving up to 99.99% availability during deployments [2].
Best Practices for Traffic Splitting
To implement dynamic traffic splitting effectively, businesses must follow proven practices tailored to their operational needs.
Automate health checks and deployment steps to ensure only fully operational instances receive traffic. Tools like Terraform, combined with CI/CD pipelines, can script infrastructure changes and streamline traffic control [2][9]. Automation not only simplifies the process but also ensures consistent deployment outcomes.
Deploy during off-peak hours to reduce risk. This is especially crucial for industries like e-commerce and financial services, where predictable traffic patterns allow for safer deployment windows [2]. Off-peak scheduling ensures minimal disruption and quicker responses to unexpected issues.
Adopt weighted routing for canary releases. Start small - directing only 10% of traffic to the new version - and monitor metrics like error rates and latency. Gradually increase traffic as confidence in the release grows [2][3]. This approach validates changes in real time without exposing most users to potential issues.
Ensure compliance with UK regulations such as GDPR and data residency requirements. Traffic management tools must be configured to respect data locality while maintaining deployment flexibility [2].
Monitor cloud costs in GBP and optimise resources to balance expenses. Choose providers with strong UK regional presence and track deployment success rates, recovery times, and cost per deployment to ensure the strategy's benefits outweigh its overheads [2][3].
Centralise observability by consolidating logs and metrics from all traffic management components. A unified view of deployment health helps teams quickly identify and resolve issues across the system [2].
How Hokstad Consulting Can Help
Hokstad Consulting offers tailored solutions to address the challenges of dynamic traffic splitting, combining technical expertise with cost optimisation. Many organisations face inefficiencies and delays in their deployment cycles - Hokstad Consulting helps resolve these issues through automated CI/CD pipelines and advanced monitoring solutions. Their approach ensures traffic splitting configurations are automated and closely monitored, eliminating manual bottlenecks.
Their expertise in cloud cost engineering is particularly valuable, helping organisations cut cloud spending by 30–50% while maintaining high performance. For businesses grappling with architectural complexity, Hokstad Consulting provides strategic cloud migration services, designing solutions that balance cost, performance, and security. They also ensure compliance with UK regulations and strict availability standards.
Additionally, their custom development services free up developers from repetitive infrastructure tasks, allowing them to focus on core business features. This addresses a common pain point - wasted developer time on managing complex configurations.
Hokstad Consulting also offers ongoing support for infrastructure monitoring and performance optimisation. Their expertise spans public, private, and hybrid cloud environments, providing the flexibility needed to meet diverse UK business needs. By aligning their strategies with zero-downtime objectives, they ensure organisations derive lasting value from dynamic traffic splitting implementations.
Conclusion
Dynamic traffic splitting has redefined deployment processes, turning what was once a risky endeavour into a carefully managed and smooth operation. By enabling a gradual shift of traffic between application versions while ensuring uninterrupted service, it has become a crucial tool for organisations striving to stay ahead in today’s fast-paced digital environment.
Key Takeaways
Dynamic traffic splitting delivers an impressive 99.99% uptime, reinforcing customer confidence and protecting revenue streams [2].
With robust health checks and continuous monitoring, only fully prepared instances handle traffic. This approach not only satisfies service level agreements (SLAs) but also meets regulatory requirements like the UK GDPR. Real-time insights through unified observability empower teams to make informed decisions with confidence.
Controlled rollouts and instant rollback mechanisms ensure both performance and business continuity remain intact. When paired with effective load balancer configurations and service mesh integrations, these practices establish reliable deployment pipelines that prioritise user experience.
The return on investment (ROI) for dynamic traffic splitting is clear. Avoiding even a single major outage can justify the additional infrastructure costs, making it a wise choice for organisations focused on reliability and long-term growth.
These advantages provide a solid foundation for organisations ready to implement this game-changing strategy.
Next Steps
Evaluate your current infrastructure and define clear service level objectives to set the stage for zero-downtime deployments. Seeking expert guidance can simplify the transition and ensure success.
Hokstad Consulting specialises in helping organisations embrace zero-downtime deployment strategies. Their services include building automated CI/CD pipelines and implementing advanced monitoring systems to tackle the technical challenges of modern deployments. With a proven track record of reducing cloud costs by 30–50% while maintaining top-tier performance, they help businesses optimise both operational efficiency and reliability.
Their tailored cloud migration services ensure compliance with UK regulations while balancing cost, performance, and security. Hokstad Consulting also offers custom automation solutions to eliminate manual inefficiencies and minimise the risk of misconfigurations.
Embarking on the journey to zero-downtime deployments doesn’t have to be a solo effort. Expert support can accelerate implementation, reduce risks, and maximise the benefits of dynamic traffic splitting. For UK businesses aiming to maintain a competitive edge through dependable, continuous delivery, partnering with specialists who understand both the technical landscape and local business needs is a smart move.
Reach out to Hokstad Consulting to explore how their customised DevOps transformation and cloud optimisation services can help your organisation achieve zero-downtime deployments that drive growth and enhance customer satisfaction.
FAQs
How does dynamic traffic splitting support UK businesses in ensuring GDPR compliance during deployments?
Dynamic traffic splitting offers UK businesses a practical way to stay GDPR-compliant during deployments by reducing risks tied to data handling and service interruptions. By gradually shifting user traffic to updated versions of an application and closely monitoring how it performs and behaves, companies can ensure sensitive data is managed securely while avoiding disruptions.
This method gives teams the chance to spot and resolve potential problems before a full rollout, lowering the risk of non-compliance due to unexpected errors or downtime. Paired with strong data protection practices, dynamic traffic splitting helps enable smooth, compliant deployments that align with GDPR standards.
What is the difference between canary deployments and blue-green deployments when using dynamic traffic splitting?
Canary deployments and blue-green deployments are two popular strategies designed to reduce risks and downtime during software releases. Both approaches can take advantage of dynamic traffic splitting, but their methods for introducing updates are distinct.
With a canary deployment, updates are introduced to a small group of users initially. This allows you to closely monitor performance, identify potential issues, and make adjustments before gradually increasing the traffic directed to the new version. Dynamic traffic splitting plays a key role here, offering fine-tuned control over how much traffic is sent to the updated version, ensuring a steady and controlled rollout.
On the other hand, blue-green deployments rely on two separate environments: one for the current version (blue) and another for the updated version (green). Once the green environment is fully prepared and tested, all user traffic is switched over in one go. Dynamic traffic splitting can assist during this process by directing a portion of traffic to the green environment for testing purposes before making the complete transition.
Both strategies are valuable for achieving zero-downtime deployments. Choosing between them depends on your specific objectives and how much risk you're willing to take on.
How do readiness and liveness probes help achieve zero downtime during deployments?
Readiness and liveness probes play a key role in ensuring that applications remain accessible and functional during deployments.
Readiness probes focus on determining whether an application is ready to handle user traffic. They check critical dependencies - like database connections or external services - before allowing requests to be routed. This ensures users don’t experience errors while the application is still in the process of starting up.
Liveness probes, on the other hand, keep an eye on the application's health after it’s up and running. If the application becomes unresponsive or runs into issues, the liveness probe steps in to trigger a restart, helping to restore normal operations. Together, these probes work to ensure that only healthy, fully operational instances serve traffic, allowing updates to happen smoothly without disrupting the user experience.