Encryption Challenges in Hybrid Cloud Networks

Encryption in hybrid cloud networks is critical but complex. As businesses increasingly adopt hybrid cloud models, securing data across diverse environments has become a top priority. Here’s a quick summary of the key challenges and solutions:

Key Challenges:

• Data Exposure During Transfers: Encryption often fails when data moves between private, public, and edge systems.
• Inconsistent Security Protocols: Different cloud providers use varied encryption tools, creating gaps.
• Key Management Complexity: Tracking and rotating encryption keys across multiple platforms is difficult.
• Limited Monitoring: Blind spots in encrypted traffic make detecting breaches harder.

Practical Solutions:

• Standard Encryption Protocols: Use TLS 1.3, AES-256, and IPsec for consistent security.
• Centralised Key Management: Implement Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) or BYOK systems.
• Unified Security Policies: Prevent configuration drift with regular audits and micro-segmentation.
• Enhanced Visibility: Deploy AI-driven monitoring tools to detect threats in encrypted traffic.

Why It Matters:

• Rising Cyber Threats: 93% of experts expect more attacks, with breaches costing UK businesses an average of £3.92 million.
• Compliance Pressure: GDPR mandates strong encryption to avoid fines of up to 4% of global revenue or €20 million.

Investing in robust encryption strategies now can save organisations from costly breaches and compliance issues later. Read on to explore these challenges and solutions in detail.

Hybrid Cloud Security Survey - The Encryption Paradox

Main Encryption Problems in Hybrid Cloud Environments

Hybrid cloud setups bring a unique set of encryption challenges that complicate security efforts compared to traditional single-environment systems. For UK businesses, these challenges create vulnerabilities even when security measures seem adequate.

Complex Multi-Environment Connections

Connecting on-premises data centres, multiple cloud providers, and edge locations is no easy task. Each uses different networking protocols, security standards, and encryption methods. As data moves through these systems, it often undergoes multiple encryption and decryption processes, creating brief windows where data can be exposed.

Take a UK financial services firm, for example. They might transfer customer data from an on-premises database to AWS, then to Microsoft Azure, and back to a private cloud. With 85% of organisations expected to adopt a cloud-first strategy by 2025 [1], scenarios like this are becoming more common. However, ensuring seamless end-to-end encryption across these platforms is a major hurdle. Encryption often works well within individual environments but may falter during data transfers, leaving vulnerabilities that could be exploited by cybercriminals.

This issue sets the stage for additional challenges, including variations in security policies, key management, and monitoring.

Different Security Policies and Protocols

Each cloud provider has its own encryption tools and protocols. For instance, AWS uses Key Management Service (KMS), Microsoft Azure offers Azure Key Vault, and Google Cloud Platform provides Cloud KMS. Meanwhile, on-premises systems often rely on entirely different encryption methods.

This fragmented approach can lead to security gaps when data moves between providers, sometimes forcing organisations to compromise on security [1].

From my experience, one of the most overlooked threats in hybrid cloud environments is silent configuration drift. Teams often assume that once a system is deployed, it stays secure. But without consistent enforcement, your environment can drift into dangerous territory.

• Dvir Shimon Sasson, Director of Security Research at Reco [3]

Adding to the complexity, changes to security policies in one environment don’t always carry over to others. This inconsistency can weaken overall security and make key management even more challenging [4].

Shared Responsibility and Key Management

The shared responsibility model further complicates hybrid cloud encryption. While cloud providers handle some security aspects, customers are responsible for others - key management being a prime example. This division often leads to unclear roles and responsibilities.

Key management is hard. In fact, it's often regarded as the most complex aspect.

• Carlos Cardenas, Director of Solutions Engineering, Joyent [5]

A staggering 76% of organisations express concerns about hybrid cloud security [6], and 80% have experienced a cloud security breach in the past year [6]. Many of these breaches stem from poor key management, such as compromised keys, weak governance, or single points of failure.

In hybrid environments, key management becomes even more daunting. Teams must track and rotate keys across multiple platforms, enforce access controls, and maintain backups. The situation is further complicated by multiple access points, which increase the difficulty of managing identities and permissions [4].

Limited Visibility and Monitoring

Visibility is a major challenge in hybrid cloud environments. Traditional monitoring tools work well in single systems but often fail to provide a unified view across multiple platforms. This creates blind spots where encrypted data moves undetected, making it harder to spot suspicious activity.

The problem worsens when monitoring tools can’t inspect encrypted traffic, leaving threats hidden in seemingly legitimate data streams. With nearly 45% of data breaches occurring in the cloud [6], the inability to monitor hybrid environments effectively can allow breaches to go unnoticed for long periods.

Without clear visibility, IT teams struggle to confirm whether data is encrypted during transit, ensure proper key management, or detect unauthorised access. During a security incident, tracing data flows across platforms becomes a time-consuming task, delaying response efforts and potentially worsening the impact of a breach.

Solutions for Encryption Problems

When encryption vulnerabilities arise in hybrid environments, targeted solutions are essential to safeguard data. Addressing these challenges involves adopting standard protocols, centralising key management, unifying security policies, and strengthening monitoring systems.

Using Standard Encryption Protocols

To protect network traffic, implement TLS 1.3, combine it with IPsec for secure communications, and use SSH tunnelling for system transfers. For data at rest, rely on AES-256 encryption to ensure consistent security across the hybrid infrastructure. Standardising these protocols helps eliminate gaps that occur when data transitions between different encryption methods, providing seamless protection.

From here, centralising key management becomes a critical next step.

Central Key Management Systems

Deploying Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) or a Bring Your Own Key Management System (BYOKMS) can centralise encryption key management, automate key rotation, and enforce strong authentication measures. HSMs, in particular, offer tamper-resistant hardware that adheres to stringent security standards [9]. This approach directly addresses the shared responsibility gap often present in hybrid environments.

Effective data encryption relies on secure key management, so you should make full use of a cloud provider's KMS if it meets your needs and meets the requirements for a secure KMS given below. - NCSC.GOV.UK [9]

In the UK, organisations should ensure their key management systems include features like automated key rotation, robust authentication, and comprehensive access controls. For example, in February 2022, Coalfire Certification awarded OneTrust an ISO/IEC 27001 accreditation for its Privacy, Security & Governance software hosted in Microsoft Azure production accounts [10]. Integrating such systems with identity and access management solutions simplifies administration while maintaining strong security practices.

Consistent Security Policy Application

Unified security policies are essential to prevent configuration drift. This involves conducting detailed risk assessments, regular testing, and maintaining clear documentation of effective measures [8].

never trust, always verify. - Fidelis Security [7]

Micro-segmentation strengthens policy enforcement by isolating workloads and securing endpoints. Techniques include host-based segmentation (using agents on devices), network-based enforcement with specialised hardware, and virtual zero trust networks employing endpoint agents [7]. Regular audits and employee training ensure these policies remain effective and responsibilities are well understood. Additionally, aligning policies with GDPR requirements - such as using encryption and pseudonymisation - enhances data protection [8].

To complement this unified approach, improving network visibility and monitoring is crucial.

Better Network Visibility and Monitoring

Enhanced monitoring systems can detect threats in encrypted traffic without compromising security. Unsupervised Machine Learning is particularly effective in hybrid environments, as it identifies patterns and anomalies without relying on predefined rules [11]. Combining agent-based monitoring (for detailed insights) with agentless solutions (for broader platform visibility) delivers comprehensive protection [11]. Real-time alert systems, supported by Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) tools, track unauthorised login attempts and data exfiltration [12].

A compelling example comes from a petrochemical manufacturer that, in October 2024, deployed Darktrace Cyber AI Analyst. The system saved 810 investigation hours, autonomously responded to 180 anomalies, and reduced phishing emails by 5% [11].

AI was a huge factor – no one else was doing what Darktrace was doing with \[AI\]. - Director of Information Technology, Petrochemical Manufacturer [11]

Additional measures include setting up cloud honeypots to detect lateral movement and insider threats, conducting cross-region and cross-account visibility audits, and using temporary, short-lived credentials to limit attackers' opportunities. A robust incident response plan ensures swift action in the event of breaches. Notably, cloud server misconfigurations account for 19% of all breaches, with each incident averaging a cost of $4.41M [7].

Encryption Solution Comparison for Hybrid Cloud Networks

Choosing the right encryption for hybrid cloud networks involves finding the right balance between security, complexity, and performance. Here’s a breakdown of the main options, building on the challenges and solutions outlined earlier.

Cloud-native encryption services are designed to integrate effortlessly with cloud platforms. They come with built-in key management features and scalable architecture, making them an attractive option for organisations heavily reliant on cloud infrastructure.

Third-party encryption software offers flexibility across multiple cloud platforms, making it ideal for organisations with complex hybrid setups that span different providers.

On-premises hardware encryption provides the highest level of control, particularly for sensitive data. Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) are a popular choice here, offering tamper-resistant protection and meeting stringent regulatory standards.

These encryption solutions typically rely on either symmetric or asymmetric encryption methods, and understanding the differences is key. Symmetric encryption uses a single secret key for both encryption and decryption, while asymmetric encryption employs a pair of public and private keys for secure communication [13].

Symmetric encryption is faster to run because it only uses a single secret key and is based on less complicated mathematics. - Michael Cobb, CISSP-ISSAP [14]

Asymmetric encryption provides strong security for data, as the private key used for decryption is kept secret and not shared with anyone. - Device Authority [15]

In practice, many hybrid cloud environments benefit from combining these approaches. For instance, TLS/SSL protocols in HTTPS use asymmetric encryption to exchange a symmetric key securely. Once exchanged, the symmetric key handles the actual data encryption, ensuring both security and efficiency [13].

Performance considerations are especially important when dealing with large datasets. Symmetric encryption methods, such as AES-256, are well-suited for encrypting large volumes of data quickly. On the other hand, asymmetric encryption is resource-intensive and better suited for high-value transactions like key exchanges [13].

For organisations based in the UK, regulatory compliance is a critical factor. Under GDPR, organisations must implement appropriate technical measures, such as encryption and pseudonymisation, to safeguard sensitive data effectively.

Ultimately, selecting the right encryption solution comes down to balancing an organisation's security needs with its operational capabilities. Each method has its strengths, and finding the right mix is crucial for maintaining robust protection in a hybrid cloud setting.

How Hokstad Consulting Helps with Hybrid Cloud Encryption

Hokstad Consulting addresses the complex challenges of hybrid cloud encryption for UK businesses by crafting strategies tailored to each organisation's specific needs. Instead of generic solutions, they take the time to understand an organisation’s technical setup, compliance requirements, and long-term goals before developing encryption strategies. This personalised approach lays the groundwork for a range of services designed to secure every stage of hybrid cloud encryption.

A key part of their approach is their DevOps transformation services. By introducing automated CI/CD pipelines with built-in security measures, Hokstad Consulting achieves impressive results, including 75% faster deployments and a 90% reduction in errors [16]. This level of automation ensures encryption policies are applied consistently across environments, reducing the risk of manual errors that could lead to security vulnerabilities.

When it comes to budgets, their cloud cost engineering services deliver significant savings, cutting infrastructure costs by 30–50% - often translating to over £50,000 in annual savings [16]. These savings can be reinvested into advanced encryption solutions, enhancing overall security without straining financial resources.

For businesses struggling with the complexity of key management, Hokstad Consulting offers centralised key management systems that work seamlessly across AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, and on-premises setups. By using cloud-agnostic solutions, they help organisations avoid vendor lock-in while ensuring compliance with UK data protection laws, including GDPR.

Their cloud migration services ensure encryption remains intact during transitions, thanks to a zero-downtime approach. This allows businesses to modernise their systems and upgrade encryption without disrupting daily operations. Additionally, Hokstad Consulting develops bespoke encryption solutions for unique compliance needs, addressing challenges that off-the-shelf products often cannot solve. These custom solutions integrate smoothly into operational frameworks, ensuring encryption remains effective over time.

To tackle network visibility challenges, Hokstad Consulting implements advanced monitoring protocols. Research highlights that only 30% of UK IT and security leaders feel their organisations have sufficient visibility into encrypted traffic, while 93% of malware hides within encryption [18]. Their unified monitoring solutions bridge on-premises and cloud systems, offering enhanced oversight [17].

Hokstad Consulting also offers flexible engagement models to suit different business needs. Whether it’s hourly consulting for specific projects or ongoing retainers for continuous optimisation, their services provide expert support without requiring long-term commitments. For businesses with tighter budgets, they offer a no savings, no fee model, where fees are capped as a percentage of the actual savings achieved. This ensures encryption improvements without financial strain.

Finally, regular security audits keep encryption solutions up to date with evolving threats and compliance requirements. As hybrid cloud environments grow and new risks emerge, Hokstad Consulting conducts assessments and updates to ensure businesses stay protected and ahead of regulatory changes.

Conclusion: Improving Encryption in Hybrid Cloud Networks

Managing encryption in hybrid cloud environments is no small task. The mix of multiple platforms, inconsistent security measures, and scattered key management systems creates weak points that hackers are quick to exploit. According to Check Point's 2024 Cloud Security Report, cloud security incidents have surged dramatically, climbing from 24% to 61% in just a year [19]. Clearly, the need for stronger encryption strategies is more pressing than ever.

A layered approach is critical - one that combines standard encryption protocols, centralised key management, and consistent security policies. Yet, the complexity of these systems is a challenge in itself. With 81% of enterprises now adopting multi-cloud strategies [20], many are grappling with the security risks that come with this approach.

The financial impact of these vulnerabilities is staggering. Data breaches now average a cost of £2.9 million [20], making prevention far cheaper than dealing with the aftermath. This underscores the value of expert guidance. Gartner predicts that by 2025, 85% of organisations will prioritise cloud-first strategies [1], leaving little time to ensure encryption measures are up to scratch.

Specialist consultancies play a pivotal role here. They don't just handle the technical side of encryption but also help organisations navigate GDPR requirements, conduct compliance audits, and train employees. Their AI-driven monitoring solutions ensure security measures remain effective and up to date, addressing the evolving challenges of hybrid cloud systems.

To tackle these issues immediately, organisations must focus on encrypting data both at rest and in transit, adopt Zero-Trust frameworks, and establish robust key management systems [1][2]. Given the complexity, external expertise is often necessary for ensuring long-term security.

As hybrid cloud environments grow more complex, encryption challenges will only become tougher. Organisations that act now - investing in strong, adaptable encryption strategies and leveraging expert support - will be better equipped to safeguard their data, ensure compliance, and avoid the heavy costs of future security breaches.

FAQs