7 Ways to Cut Cloud Costs Without Losing Performance | Hokstad Consulting

7 Ways to Cut Cloud Costs Without Losing Performance

7 Ways to Cut Cloud Costs Without Losing Performance

Did you know that 30% of cloud spending is wasted? For UK businesses, this translates to around £300,000 lost for every £1 million spent annually. But cutting cloud costs doesn’t mean sacrificing performance. Here’s how you can save up to 25% on cloud expenses while keeping systems running smoothly:

  • Identify and remove idle resources: Shut down unused virtual machines or containers to save up to 70% in development environments.

  • Use Reserved Instances and Savings Plans: Commit to predictable workloads and cut costs by up to 75%.

  • Set up auto-scaling policies: Dynamically adjust resources to match demand and eliminate over-provisioning.

  • Optimise storage tiering: Move infrequently accessed data to cheaper storage tiers.

  • Leverage serverless architecture: Pay only for what you use and save up to 40% on infrastructure expenses.

  • Apply resource tagging: Track costs effectively with mandatory tagging and real-time dashboards.

  • Schedule workloads for off-peak hours: Run non-critical tasks during low-demand periods and cut computing costs by up to 75%.

These strategies ensure your cloud budget delivers maximum value without compromising performance. Start small - shut down idle resources or optimise storage - and build from there. The right mix of quick wins and long-term changes can transform your cloud spending.

How to control cloud costs without doing less

1. Find and Remove Idle Compute Resources

Cutting down cloud costs without compromising performance often starts with tackling idle compute resources. These are virtual machines or containers that stay active but see little to no usage. Left unchecked, they can cause cloud bills to balloon - wasting up to £21 billion annually, or 33% of cloud budgets, and costing hundreds of pounds per idle instance each month [8].

Take this example: a marketing agency might deploy dedicated instances for client campaigns during the holidays. Once the campaign ends, those instances might sit idle, quietly racking up unnecessary expenses [10]. Addressing these hidden costs can lead to immediate savings. In fact, one company slashed its cloud costs by nearly 30% by shutting down idle resources, while others have achieved savings of up to 70% in development environments by automating shutdowns [11][9].

Automated Resource Monitoring

Automated monitoring tools are essential for identifying underutilised resources. These systems continuously scan your infrastructure, flagging resources that haven't been used for a specified period - 15 days, for instance, is a common threshold used by many cloud recommender systems [5].

AWS provides built-in tools like Cost Explorer, Trusted Advisor, and CloudWatch, which help visualise spending trends, suggest optimisation opportunities, and send alerts when resource usage drops below set thresholds [6]. For more advanced capabilities, platforms like Lightlytics allow for custom search criteria based on tags and resource attributes, making it easier to pinpoint idle resources [6]. To ensure accuracy, it's crucial to monitor multiple metrics - such as CPU usage, memory consumption, network activity, and disk I/O - to distinguish genuinely idle resources from those experiencing temporary dips in activity.

Once idle resources are identified, the next step is to establish rules for automatically shutting them down.

Setting Up Termination Policies

Automated termination policies can be applied to stop or decommission idle instances based on predefined criteria [10]. However, before implementing these rules, it's important to assess their impact. Consider factors like restart times, the risk to critical services requiring high availability, and ensure that any connected databases or storage volumes have proper data backup or persistence strategies in place [10].

Development and testing environments are particularly well-suited for aggressive termination policies since they often don't need to operate outside standard working hours. For instance, scheduling these environments to shut down at 6 PM and restart at 8 AM can yield significant savings without affecting productivity. In production environments, it’s usually better to focus on rightsizing - adjusting instance sizes to reduce idle capacity - or consolidating workloads onto fewer instances during off-peak periods.

Idle resources can be a significant cause of bill shock in the cloud, and are low-hanging fruit when it comes to cloud cost optimisation. – CUDO Ventures [7]

The best approach combines proactive monitoring with clear termination policies, ensuring idle resources are addressed before they spiral into unnecessary costs.

2. Use Reserved Instances and Savings Plans

If your business operates with predictable workloads, Reserved Instances (RIs) and Savings Plans can significantly reduce your cloud computing costs compared to pay-as-you-go pricing. These models reward commitment by offering discounts of up to 75% off On-Demand rates when you commit to compute usage for one to three years [14].

The main distinction between the two lies in how you commit. Reserved Instances require you to reserve specific computing capacity and pay upfront, while Savings Plans involve committing to a specific hourly spend (£ amount) over the contract period [12][15]. AWS Savings Plans can cut costs by up to 72%, while Standard RIs may offer slightly better savings at 75% off On-Demand pricing [12][14].

Comparing Flexibility and Usage

Choosing between RIs and Savings Plans depends on your workload's characteristics. Savings Plans are more flexible, as they work across multiple services like EC2, Fargate, and Lambda, regardless of the instance family, operating system, or AWS region [12]. On the other hand, Reserved Instances - while potentially offering higher discounts - are tied to specific instance types and regions. However, they can also be applied to services like RDS [12].

If you’re looking for a balance between flexibility and cost savings, Convertible RIs might be the answer. These offer around 54% savings compared to On-Demand rates and allow you to exchange instances as your needs change [14]. This flexibility makes them ideal for workloads where requirements might evolve over time.

Unlike usage optimisation, which requires continuous human input, rate optimisation offers a way to lock in savings upfront, freeing up teams to focus on higher-impact work. – Matt Stellpflug, Senior FinOps Specialist, ProsperOps [16]

Balancing Commitment Levels

To maximise savings, aim to purchase RIs when your utilisation is at least 75% over the contract period [12]. For workloads with uncertain long-term needs, opt for Convertible RIs or Savings Plans, which provide the flexibility to adapt as your infrastructure evolves.

For stable, production workloads, Standard RIs are a solid choice. For projects with changing requirements, use Convertible RIs, and for development environments or workloads with variable demands, Compute Savings Plans are ideal. This mix helps you balance savings with flexibility.

Avoid large, upfront annual commitments by staggering your purchases. A rolling approach allows you to adjust your strategy as business needs change [16]. For non-compute services like RDS, ElastiCache, and OpenSearch, distributing RI purchases over time helps maintain flexibility.

When it comes to payment options, All Upfront payments generally yield the highest savings. However, Partial Upfront or No Upfront options might be better if you need more budget flexibility [12][13]. While higher upfront payments save more overall, you’ll need to weigh this against cash flow considerations.

Timing Purchase Decisions

Before committing, analyse your historical usage with tools like AWS Cost Explorer or the Cost and Usage Report (CUR) for at least six months [16][18]. Look for consistent patterns while accounting for any seasonal changes or business cycles.

For new workloads, start with On-Demand instances to establish usage patterns. Run these applications for one to two months to identify the most cost-effective instance types that meet your performance needs, reducing the risk of locking into suboptimal long-term commitments [17].

Buy reserved instances only if you'll be using it nearly 24 hours a day, seven days a week (or at least more than 75 percent of the time). – Velez Vasquez, CEO of Home Security [17]

Timing your purchases strategically ensures your commitments align with cost-saving goals. For example, queue Savings Plans to activate automatically when existing reservations expire, avoiding any gaps where On-Demand rates might apply [12][14].

Monitor metrics like Effective Savings Rate (ESR) and Commitment Lock-in Risk (CLR) to maintain a balance between savings and flexibility [16]. Regularly track utilisation to identify coverage gaps where additional commitments could save more - just be cautious not to overcommit based on temporary peak usage.

Finally, automate reservation management to simplify the process. With multiple commitments to track, manual oversight can become overwhelming. Conduct quarterly reviews to ensure your strategy stays aligned with your evolving business and usage needs.

3. Set Up Detailed Auto-Scaling Policies

Auto-scaling is a game-changer for managing cloud resources. It adjusts your resources dynamically to meet real-time workload demands, helping you avoid over-provisioning and under-provisioning. This approach can significantly cut cloud waste - organisations waste around 32% of their cloud spend on average[21] - while keeping application performance on point. However, the effectiveness of auto-scaling hinges on how well your policies are set up.

The secret to making auto-scaling work lies in crafting policies that adapt smartly to actual demand patterns, rather than relying on basic thresholds. This ensures your applications always have the right amount of resources at the right time, balancing performance with cost.

Auto scaling in cloud computing is not just a technological advancement; it's a strategic approach to dynamically allocate resources in response to varying demand levels. - IT Convergence [19]

There are three main types of auto-scaling, each tailored to specific workload needs. These can be used individually or combined for a more robust resource management strategy:

Scaling Type Description Best Use Case
Predictive Auto Scaling Leverages historical data and machine learning to forecast future demand Ideal for workloads with predictable cycles
Reactive Auto Scaling Adjusts resources in real time based on current usage Perfect for managing sudden traffic surges
Scheduled Auto Scaling Changes resource allocation based on a pre-set schedule Suited for planned events or known demand peaks

These methods create a foundation for more advanced techniques, such as multi-metric scaling.

Multi-Metric Scaling Rules

Multi-metric scaling takes auto-scaling a step further by using multiple data points - like CPU, memory, network I/O, and application-specific metrics - to make more precise scaling decisions[19]. For instance, queue-based applications can use queue size as a key metric. Since queue size directly impacts request latency, scaling based on this measure ensures smooth performance by adding resources during high demand and scaling down when load decreases[24]. Similarly, batch size can be used to fine-tune scaling for latency-sensitive workloads, ensuring resources match the volume of incoming requests[24].

To make multi-metric policies effective, start with a detailed workload analysis. Use at least three months of historical data to identify genuine resource patterns. Set realistic scaling limits to avoid over-adjustments and ensure smooth scaling by maintaining enough margin between scale-out and scale-in thresholds[22]. Once metrics are in place, focus on managing scaling intervals effectively.

Cooldown Periods and Orchestration

The timing of scaling actions is just as important as the metrics themselves. Cooldown periods are lockout intervals after a scaling event, giving the system time to stabilise before making further adjustments[25]. Without these intervals, resources could oscillate unnecessarily, leading to inefficiencies.

The intention of the cooldown period is to prevent your Auto Scaling group from launching or terminating additional instances before the effects of previous activities are visible. - Didier_Durand, EXPERT [26]

Cooldown periods should be tailored to your application’s startup times. For applications that start quickly, shorter cooldowns are better. On the other hand, scale-out events might need longer periods to ensure new instances are fully operational.

Advanced scaling strategies like target tracking and step scaling can bypass cooldown periods for faster scale-out responses. In containerised setups, tools like Kubernetes Horizontal Pod Autoscaler work alongside cooldown configurations to manage scaling at a more granular level.

For the best results, combine scheduled scaling - which handles predictable patterns - with reactive scaling to manage unexpected demand shifts. This approach helps strike a balance between cost efficiency and performance[22]. For example, using AWS Auto Scaling with Spot Instances can save over 66% compared to On-Demand instances[20].

Finally, keep an eye on your scaling activities. Tools like CloudWatch make it easier to spot deviations and fine-tune your policies as your application usage evolves[20][23]. Regular monitoring ensures your auto-scaling setup stays aligned with your needs.

4. Improve Cloud Storage Tiering and Retention

After tackling compute waste, the next big step in cutting cloud costs is optimising storage tiering. Storage, if not managed strategically, can quickly become a financial burden. Many organisations still store nearly all their data in high-performance, expensive tiers, even though only about 2% of it is retained year after year[29].

The key to smarter storage is aligning data tiers with how frequently the data is accessed. For example, newer data might require immediate availability, while older files can be shifted to cheaper storage tiers without affecting day-to-day operations. This approach helps trim storage expenses while maintaining the performance you need.

Understanding Storage Tiers

Storage tiers are designed to balance cost and access speed:

  • Hot tiers: For frequently accessed data - fast but expensive.

  • Cool tiers: For data that's accessed less often - slower but more affordable.

  • Archive tiers: For long-term storage - ideal for rarely accessed data but with slower retrieval times.

By carefully matching data to its appropriate tier, you can achieve a balance between cost efficiency and performance. Tools like lifecycle policies and geo-replication settings can further optimise your storage strategy.

Lifecycle Management Policies

Lifecycle management policies automate the process of moving data between storage tiers based on rules you define. This eliminates the need for manual intervention, ensuring data is stored in the most cost-effective tier for its usage pattern[31].

For example, analyse your data's access patterns - like when it was created and how often it's accessed - to decide when it should move to a cheaper tier.

Since the launch of S3 Intelligent-Tiering in 2018, we've automatically saved ~30% per month on our storage costs without any impact on performance or need to analyze our data. With the new Archive Instant Access tier, we anticipate automatically realising the benefit of archive storage pricing, while retaining the ability to access our data instantly when needed. - Kalyana Chadalavada, Head of Efficiency at Stripe[28]

Take an e-commerce platform as an example. It generates terabytes of log data daily. By implementing an S3 Lifecycle Policy, the platform stores recent logs in S3 Standard for immediate analysis, transitions them to S3 Standard-IA after 30 days, moves them to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 90 days, and deletes logs older than a year[27].

Metadata tags can make these policies even more effective. Use them to classify data by type, department, or importance, allowing for more precise rules than just relying on age. For instance, customer-facing content might stay in hot storage longer than internal documentation.

To avoid surprises, test your policies on a small data sample before rolling them out fully. Keep in mind that while lifecycle management policies are free, API calls and early deletion fees for cooler tiers can add costs if not planned carefully[30][27].

Once you've streamlined tiering, the next step is to refine your data replication strategy.

Reducing Redundant Geo-Replication

Geo-redundant storage enhances data availability and reliability by replicating it across multiple locations[32]. However, applying the same level of redundancy to all data - regardless of its importance - can lead to unnecessary expenses.

Start by identifying which workloads are critical and which aren't. For example, customer databases and financial records might need full geo-redundancy, but development environments, temporary files, and archived logs often don’t. Given that downtime can cost businesses anywhere from £340 to £7,200 per minute, prioritising critical systems is essential[32].

Here’s a breakdown of redundancy options to consider:

Redundancy Type Data Copies Use Case Cost Level
Locally-Redundant Storage (LRS) 3 copies in one location Non-critical data, development environments Lowest
Zone-Redundant Storage (ZRS) 3 copies across availability zones Applications needing regional high availability Medium
Geo-Redundant Storage (GRS) 6 copies across regions Critical business data, compliance requirements High
Geo-Zone Redundant Storage (GZRS) Multiple copies across zones and regions Mission-critical applications Highest

Designing your system with cost in mind involves monitoring outbound network traffic, minimising data transfers, compressing network streams, and leveraging content delivery networks (CDNs)[34]. For instance, storing data closer to users can reduce egress costs, and CDNs can cache assets near your audience instead of relying on geo-replication.

For geographic distribution, compressing network traffic can significantly reduce transfer volumes, especially for text-based files, logs, and documents[34].

Regularly revisit your replication settings as your business needs evolve. Data that once required global availability might become less critical over time, allowing you to scale back redundancy. On the other hand, new critical systems might need enhanced protection. Continuous monitoring of your cloud resources can help uncover areas where you can save money while maintaining efficiency[33].

To strike the right balance, consider tiered redundancy models. For example:

  • Use N+1 redundancy for standard operations.

  • Opt for 2N redundancy for important systems.

  • Go for 2N+1 redundancy for mission-critical applications.

This approach ensures your data is protected at the right level without overspending[33].

Need help optimizing your cloud costs?

Get expert advice on how to reduce your cloud expenses without sacrificing performance.

5. Use Serverless Architecture for Event-Driven Workloads

Serverless computing is a smart way to cut costs by eliminating charges for idle infrastructure. Unlike traditional servers, which often bill for unused capacity, serverless models ensure you pay only for the resources you actively use. This approach aligns perfectly with workloads that fluctuate or are unpredictable.

By combining serverless architecture with an optimised storage strategy, you can significantly reduce costs for compute-heavy tasks. For instance, small to medium-sized businesses adopting serverless solutions have reported saving up to 40% on infrastructure expenses [35]. A mid-sized financial services firm, for example, used serverless functions to automate document processing. The result? Processing times dropped from days to minutes, operational costs were slashed by 40%, and compliance improved [36].

Serverless functions are particularly effective for event-driven tasks, such as handling file uploads or responding to API requests. These functions activate only when needed, scaling instantly to meet demand. This makes them ideal for workloads that experience sudden spikes or irregular activity, where traditional servers might sit idle and waste resources.

Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) Models

Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) is the most focused form of serverless computing. Here, individual functions execute in response to specific triggers, and you’re billed only for the exact compute time used. For instance, AWS Lambda charges based on the milliseconds a function runs, so a task that takes 100 milliseconds incurs costs for just that duration.

Major companies use AWS Lambda for tasks like image processing, video transcoding, and telemetry data analysis. One retailer, for example, switched from fixed servers to Lambda-based microservices to manage holiday traffic surges. This move cut infrastructure costs by 30% [36] and ensured smooth performance during peak periods.

To maximise savings and efficiency, design your functions to handle specific tasks and keep them lightweight. Shorter execution times reduce costs and minimise cold start delays. Simplifying database access - such as using caching solutions - and limiting unnecessary libraries can further optimise performance. Regularly monitor your functions for errors, resource usage, and performance to identify areas for improvement.

Keep in mind that cold starts, which occur when a function is invoked after being idle, can cause slight delays. Optimising your function code and reducing dependencies can help mitigate this issue.

State Management for Long-Running Workflows

While serverless functions excel at handling short tasks, managing longer workflows requires external state management. Serverless architectures are inherently stateless, so tools like NoSQL databases (e.g., AWS DynamoDB) or caching systems (e.g., Redis or ElastiCache) are essential for maintaining state. These solutions offer low-latency performance and can ease database loads.

For more complex workflows, orchestration tools like AWS Step Functions or Azure Durable Functions are invaluable. They manage state transitions and ensure transactional integrity without the need for intricate retry logic. A financial advisor app, for instance, adopted serverless workflows and saw a 70% reduction in server management tasks. This allowed developers to focus on adding new features while the app scaled effortlessly during market fluctuations [38].

Ensure your serverless functions are idempotent, meaning they can be safely retried without unintended side effects. This helps manage scenarios like duplicate event triggers or retry logic after failure. - Aviad Mor, CTO, Lumigo [39]

To handle traffic spikes and prevent state loss, consider using message queues like Amazon SQS. These queues decouple services, buffer data processing, and provide automatic retry mechanisms for failed operations. Adopting event-driven architectures with asynchronous communication can also enhance scalability and responsiveness. Organisations using these strategies have reported up to 20% faster time-to-market for new features [37].

Finally, keep a close eye on your data storage costs and refine usage habits. Businesses leveraging serverless models have achieved up to 60% reductions in operational expenses and a 90% increase in deployment speed. Adding automated error handling to the mix can reduce downtime by as much as 75% [38].

6. Apply FinOps-Driven Resource Tagging

Getting resource tagging right is a cornerstone of managing cloud costs effectively. FinOps tagging involves attaching metadata to resources like virtual machines, storage, and networks based on their purpose, owner, or environment [40]. This approach transforms disorganised cloud spending into measurable and traceable costs.

By using effective tagging, organisations can gain a detailed understanding of how their cloud budgets are being utilised. It enables precise cost tracking and reporting, making it easier to allocate expenses to specific teams or projects. This not only helps in assessing the return on investment for various initiatives but also brings clarity to budget management. Additionally, tagging reveals how specific workloads drive resource consumption, which improves cost forecasting and planning [40].

Consider the case of a multinational company that faced excessive cloud spending in their marketing department. By adopting FinOps tagging, they implemented mandatory tags like CostCenter, Project, and Environment. Using Infrastructure as Code (IaC), they automated the application of these tags. The result? Enhanced visibility into spending patterns, policies to shut down unused test environments, and a significant reduction in costs. Monthly reports sent to department heads further boosted accountability [40].

Mandatory Tagging Policies

Mandatory tagging ensures every cloud resource is classified and traceable, bringing structure and consistency to cloud environments. Standardising tags and preventing the creation of non-compliant assets are key steps in this process [41]. Service Control Policies (SCPs) can enforce tagging rules across accounts, working in tandem with tag policies to ensure tags are applied and maintained [41].

Start with advisory enforcement to give teams time to adjust, then move to automated, mandatory tagging [42]. Use a consistent key/value format across departments and clearly communicate the benefits to stakeholders to encourage cooperation [42]. Governance plays a crucial role here - publish tagging policies centrally and keep teams informed about updates [42].

Your tag strategy should not only contain tag definitions but also define how to include governance and enforcement of the strategy. - Mark Radonic, ServiceNow Employee [44]

Implement tagging in phases. Begin with new resources, then gradually address existing ones. Cascade tags from resource groups or cloud accounts to all underlying assets for consistency. Use tools like service catalogues or DevOps pipelines to enforce tagging before resources are even created [44].

For example, AWS offers Tag Policies that require tags such as costcenter and team on all EC2 instances. Combined with SCPs, these policies can block the creation of untagged instances, ensuring every new resource is properly tagged [41].

Policy-as-code simplifies enforcement by scanning infrastructure code for errors before resource deployment. Runtime tools can also identify untagged or orphaned resources, ensuring nothing falls through the cracks [43].

Consistent tagging lets you track resource usage and associated costs, ensuring you're not paying for unidentified resources that go unnoticed and no longer needed. - Tom Croll, Advisor at Lionfish Tech Advisors [43]

With a solid tagging policy in place, you can use real-time dashboards to monitor cloud spending and take action as needed.

Real-Time Cost Dashboards

Real-time dashboards turn tagged data into actionable insights, offering a unified view of trends, billing, and resource usage. This makes it easy to spot inefficiencies and address them quickly [45].

These dashboards allow teams to react instantly to cost anomalies. By tracking expenses in real time, they can determine if spending aligns with expectations or if adjustments are needed to prevent overspending. This enables timely reallocation of resources to more productive workloads [4].

Take Skyscanner, for instance. By implementing CloudZero in just two weeks, they identified savings that covered a full year of licensing costs. Similarly, Validity - a data quality and email marketing company - reduced the time spent managing costs by 90% using CloudZero's platform [4].

Automated alerts are another powerful feature. These notify teams when usage or spending approaches predefined limits, allowing quick action to prevent budget overruns. By integrating cloud cost data into unified platforms, organisations can gain both high-level and granular insights - for example, analysing costs per customer or feature [4].

Unified reporting tools consolidate data from multiple cloud providers, offering a clear and comprehensive view of expenses. This empowers teams across finance, IT, and operations to dive deep into costs, spot trends, and identify areas for improvement. Adding predictive analytics to the mix further enhances the ability to forecast future spending based on past patterns [45].

When teams have access to the right data at the right time, they can make informed decisions that positively impact both costs and product quality. The investment in robust tagging and real-time dashboards quickly proves its worth, reinforcing cost optimisation efforts across your cloud infrastructure [4].

7. Schedule Non-Critical Workloads for Off-Peak Hours

Shifting non-critical workloads to off-peak hours can significantly reduce cloud costs while maintaining performance levels [47].

The savings potential here is impressive. Organisations can cut computing costs by as much as 75% or more simply by running instances for eight hours a day on weekdays instead of continuously [46]. This approach not only reduces unnecessary expenses but also ensures resources are used more efficiently [48].

The key is figuring out which workloads can be deferred. Tasks like development environments, testing suites, data backups, batch processing jobs, and analytics often don’t need to run during standard business hours. These can easily be rescheduled to evenings, weekends, or other low-demand periods. However, it’s worth keeping in mind the global nature of many teams - what’s considered off-peak in London might align with peak hours in another region [46].

Time-Based Automation

Automation makes off-peak scheduling a seamless process rather than a manual task. By leveraging software, workload automation can handle scheduling, initiating, and executing various processes and workflows [50]. Modern automation tools focus on real-time processing and event-driven triggers, moving beyond traditional fixed schedules [50]. Solutions like Cloud Workload Automation (CWA) and Hybrid Workload Automation (HWA) ensure tasks are carried out at the most efficient times under predefined conditions [52]. These tools also allow for customisation, such as setting up exception handling, SLA rules, and dynamic triggers, freeing processes from rigid time constraints [51].

Redwood allows us to deliver the highest level of customer service, with less effort and fewer resources than if we were working manually. Redwood is the heartbeat of our processes, and it would be a challenge to work without it. - Leon Verhagen, Director of IT Operations, bol.com [51]

A practical example comes from BlueBay Asset Management, which implemented ActiveBatch Workload Automation to centralise job scheduling and enhance system performance. This automation covered critical business processes, from risk assessments to IT operations, leading to cost savings, better compliance, and improved workflow visibility [52].

To get started, create a clear plan for shutting down unused development resources during off-hours. This allows teams to adapt schedules for different time zones [46]. Automation tools like AWS Lambda or Kubernetes can simplify this process further [49]. Sharing real-time cost-saving data with teams can also encourage broader adoption of these initiatives [46]. Pairing time-based automation with flexible pricing options can amplify the savings.

Spot Instance Integration

For workloads that can tolerate interruptions, spot instances offer an additional way to save money. These instances utilise spare cloud capacity, making them ideal for tasks like batch processing, data analysis, or development work - provided the systems can handle occasional disruptions. Industries such as healthcare and retail have successfully implemented off-peak strategies to cut costs [53]. For example, one major retail chain reduced labour expenses by shifting administrative and stocking tasks to non-peak hours [53].

Integrating these strategies aligns perfectly with the broader goal of this article: cutting costs without compromising performance.

Conclusion: Achieving Cost Efficiency Without Compromising Performance

These seven strategies show it's possible to reduce cloud costs while maintaining strong performance. The key lies in adopting a thoughtful, strategic approach that balances cost-saving measures with operational needs.

The potential for savings is substantial. Studies reveal that cloud spending often includes significant waste, and with the right strategies, organisations can trim 15–25% of costs without disrupting core operations [2]. This underscores the untapped opportunities for improvement that don't compromise system performance.

Think of cloud cost optimisation as an ongoing process. As Doron Grinstein from Control Plane puts it: Cloud cost optimisation is all about maximising the value you get from your cloud computing investments. It's the practice of continuously analysing and adjusting your cloud resource usage and spending to ensure you're not wasting money on resources you don't actually need. [1]

Quick adjustments, like shutting down idle resources, enforcing proper tagging, and rescheduling non-critical workloads, can yield immediate savings. Meanwhile, more comprehensive approaches - such as leveraging Reserved Instances (with savings of up to 72%), Spot Instances (offering up to 90% cost reductions), auto-scaling, and FinOps principles - lay the groundwork for sustained cost efficiency [54]. These tactics complement the detailed strategies discussed earlier, creating a robust framework for optimisation.

The most effective organisations go a step further by fostering a FinOps culture. This mindset aligns finance and IT teams, promoting shared responsibility for cloud usage and embedding cost awareness into everyday operations [3]. Regular monitoring, real-time analytics, and automated optimisation tools ensure a sustainable approach to managing costs over the long term.

Ultimately, achieving cost efficiency without sacrificing performance requires a mix of immediate actions and long-term strategies. By balancing these efforts, organisations can maximise their cloud investments while ensuring the performance their business relies on. Start implementing these strategies, track their effectiveness, and adjust as needed to maintain a sustainable and efficient cloud environment.

FAQs

How can I identify and manage unused cloud resources to cut costs effectively?

To keep cloud costs in check, it’s essential to regularly evaluate your resources for anything that’s underused or sitting idle. A good starting point is to perform regular audits of your cloud environment. These audits can help you spot resources that are either no longer needed or running well below their capacity. Most cloud platforms provide built-in tools that can assist with this task, often offering recommendations for idle or underutilised resources.

Once you’ve identified these resources, you can take steps to either optimise or remove them. For instance, you might delete unused IP addresses, archive or remove detached storage volumes, or resize virtual machines to better align with their actual workload. By actively managing idle resources, you can cut down on unnecessary spending while still maintaining the performance you need.

What’s the difference between Reserved Instances and Savings Plans, and how can I choose the best option for my business?

Reserved Instances (RIs) vs Savings Plans: What's the Difference?

When it comes to reducing AWS cloud costs, Reserved Instances (RIs) and Savings Plans are two popular pricing models to consider.

RIs work by committing to a specific instance type and region for a fixed term - either one or three years. In return, you can save up to 72% compared to On-Demand pricing. The catch? They’re less flexible since you're locked into a particular configuration for the duration of the commitment.

Savings Plans, on the other hand, offer up to 66% savings by committing to a set hourly spend. What makes them appealing is their flexibility - you can switch between instance types, regions, and even operating systems without losing the discount.

Which One Should You Choose?

It all boils down to your workload. If your usage patterns are predictable and consistent, RIs can maximise your savings. But if your workloads fluctuate or you anticipate changes in instance types or regions, Savings Plans provide the flexibility to adapt to those shifts while still cutting costs.

How does using FinOps-driven resource tagging help track costs and manage budgets in cloud environments?

Adopting FinOps-driven resource tagging gives organisations a transparent view of their cloud usage and spending. By tagging resources based on projects, teams, or departments, you can track costs more precisely, spot spending trends, and enhance accountability.

This method not only helps with better financial planning but also uncovers areas to cut costs and ensures resources are used wisely. It empowers organisations to make smarter financial decisions while keeping cloud budgets under control, all without sacrificing performance.