Policy-as-Code: Enforcing Compliance in CI/CD

Policy-as-Code (PaC) is a method to automate compliance checks within CI/CD pipelines by turning security and regulatory rules into code. This ensures faster, consistent, and secure software delivery by catching issues early in development, reducing costs, and minimising risks. PaC integrates compliance directly into workflows, streamlining processes that traditionally relied on manual checks.

Key Takeaways:

• Automation: PaC automates compliance checks, cutting review times from weeks to seconds.
• Consistency: Codified policies ensure uniform enforcement across development, staging, and production.
• Cost Savings: Early detection of issues prevents expensive post-deployment fixes and regulatory fines.
• Risk Reduction: Policies validate code and infrastructure changes, safeguarding against non-compliance.
• Efficiency: Developers receive instant feedback, allowing them to address violations immediately.

PaC is implemented through structured policy definitions (e.g., YAML, Python) stored in version control systems. These policies are enforced at key CI/CD stages - pre-commit, build, and post-deployment - using tools like Open Policy Agent (OPA). Continuous monitoring ensures compliance even after deployment, with dashboards providing insights to refine processes further.

By embedding compliance directly into CI/CD pipelines, PaC simplifies adherence to regulatory standards like PCI DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR. It also supports cost optimisation through early issue detection and reduces the operational burden on teams. Gradual enforcement strategies, clear documentation, and collaboration among stakeholders are essential for successful implementation.

For organisations, PaC is not just about meeting compliance - it’s a way to ensure security, reduce risks, and maintain efficiency in software delivery.

Integrating Policy as code into your CI/CD pipeline | SANS Cloud & DevOps Security Summit 2020

Benefits of Implementing Policy-as-Code

Introducing Policy-as-Code into CI/CD pipelines brings more than just automation to the table. It offers measurable improvements in speed, reliability, and cost control, all while helping organisations maintain strict compliance standards. These improvements don’t just happen in isolation - they build on each other over time, creating a solid foundation for growth and operational efficiency. Automating compliance doesn’t just speed things up; it also strengthens the reliability and security measures we discussed earlier. The result? Smoother workflows and ongoing improvements throughout the development lifecycle.

Automation and Efficiency

Policy-as-Code takes compliance - a task that often slows teams down - and turns it into an automated process that integrates seamlessly with development workflows. Every time code is committed or infrastructure is modified, policies automatically evaluate the changes [2][3]. This removes the delays associated with traditional compliance reviews, which could take days or even weeks to complete manually.

The efficiency gains here are hard to ignore. Automated CI/CD pipelines can speed up deployments by as much as 75%, while automated practices can reduce errors by up to 90%. Some teams have even reported deployment speeds increasing tenfold [1]. These time savings allow developers to focus on more strategic tasks. Plus, with instant feedback on policy violations, teams can address issues right away, while the details are still fresh in their minds [3].

Automation also ensures consistency. Every change is subjected to the same set of policy checks, eliminating the inconsistencies that often come with manual reviews [2]. This repeatable and standardised process strengthens compliance across the board.

Consistency Across Environments

Consistency is another major win with Policy-as-Code. It ensures that compliance standards are applied uniformly across development, staging, and production environments. Instead of relying on separate manual processes or configurations for each environment, a single set of codified rules is applied automatically [2]. This eliminates the risk of configuration drift - if something passes compliance in development, it will also meet the standards in production. This reduces deployment failures and post-deployment security issues.

Organisations can take this a step further by tailoring Policy Sets to the specific needs of each environment while maintaining a consistent baseline [6]. For example, production environments might require stricter encryption and approval workflows, while development environments focus on catching basic misconfigurations. By using a unified set of policies, onboarding new team members becomes easier, and errors caused by inconsistent practices are minimised [6].

Cost Reduction and Risk Mitigation

Catching policy violations early in development can save organisations a significant amount of money. By preventing non-compliant code from reaching production, businesses avoid costly post-deployment fixes, security incident responses, and potential regulatory fines [2].

The financial benefits are substantial. Companies can save 30–50% on infrastructure costs through optimisation strategies, with cloud cost engineering delivering annual savings of over £50,000 in some cases [1]. For example, a SaaS company saved £120,000 annually through cloud optimisation, while an e-commerce site saw a 50% performance boost alongside a 30% cost reduction. Another success story involves a tech startup that cut deployment times from six hours to just 20 minutes, showcasing the operational efficiencies possible [1].

These savings come from multiple angles. Automated compliance checks reduce the need for time-intensive manual reviews and audits, cutting operational costs while enhancing security. By identifying vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and compliance gaps early - such as ensuring S3 buckets are encrypted or container images are free from critical CVEs - issues are resolved before they become serious problems [9]. Addressing these concerns proactively is far cheaper than dealing with compliance violations after deployment, which could involve emergency fixes, system downtime, and reputational damage [9]. Effective DevOps practices and cloud optimisation can even cut infrastructure-related downtime by 95%, contributing to a more stable and compliant environment [1].

Risk management is another area where Policy-as-Code shines. By validating code and infrastructure changes against policies before deployment, organisations can prevent violations from ever reaching production [9]. Continuous validation ensures that policies are applied consistently, creating a reliable approach to risk management [2]. Maintaining a single source of truth for policies further reduces the chance of inconsistent enforcement, which could otherwise leave security gaps [2].

At Hokstad Consulting, Policy-as-Code isn’t just about compliance - it’s about creating a system where better governance reduces both costs and risks. This frees up resources for innovation, allowing organisations to scale their efforts without needing to expand their teams. The result? Greater efficiency and less pressure to hire additional staff [6].

How Policy-as-Code Works in CI/CD Pipelines

Policy-as-Code shifts compliance from being a manual, last-minute task to an automated process integrated throughout the development lifecycle. Instead of waiting until the end to ensure code aligns with organisational standards, policies are checked continuously - from the moment a developer starts coding to post-deployment monitoring. These policies are written in structured formats, enforced at specific CI/CD stages, and regularly reviewed after deployment. This systematic approach lays the groundwork for defining, enforcing, and monitoring policies effectively.

Defining and Managing Policies

To create policies, compliance standards are translated into machine-readable code using policy languages. These definitions are then formalised into reusable formats that integrate seamlessly into development workflows [2].

Policies are stored in version control systems like GitHub, much like application code. This approach allows teams to track changes, roll back to previous versions when needed, and collaborate on policy updates. Peer reviews ensure that all changes are vetted before implementation, enabling input from developers, security teams, and other stakeholders [4][8].

If a new policy version causes issues, reverting to an earlier version is straightforward, avoiding the need for complex manual adjustments [4][5]. A centralised authorisation team often oversees policy updates to ensure alignment with DevOps practices. Policies can either be written in languages like ALFA or created using web-based editors, then compiled and committed to source repositories [8].

Organisations managing multiple compliance requirements benefit from grouping related policies into Policy Sets. This approach ensures consistent application of rules across various pipelines and environments, simplifying updates and reducing the effort required to manage individual policies. As organisations scale, managing policies in sets provides a structured way to handle growing governance needs without adding unnecessary complexity [6].

Once policies are defined and versioned, automated enforcement ensures they are applied consistently across CI/CD stages.

Policy Enforcement in CI/CD Stages

With policies in place, automated enforcement ensures compliance at every stage of the CI/CD pipeline. Policies are evaluated at three key points, serving as checkpoints to catch compliance issues early [9].

Pre-commit evaluation takes place before code is added to the repository. Developers use CLI tools or IDE plugins to validate their code against policies during development. This immediate feedback helps them fix violations on the spot, saving time and avoiding delays caused by discovering issues later.

Build phase evaluation kicks in once code is committed to the repository and enters the pipeline. As new or updated code is processed, the pipeline automatically runs policy checks. Tools like Jenkins integrate these workflows, ensuring policies are enforced as part of the CI/CD process [2][8].

If a violation is detected during the pipeline, the system flags it immediately. Depending on the enforcement mode, the pipeline can either issue a warning (WARN mode) or halt entirely (ERROR mode). This flexibility allows organisations to introduce new policies gradually without disrupting workflows [6].

Post-deployment evaluation ensures compliance continues after the code is live. Monitoring systems validate that deployed resources adhere to policies, identifying any issues or deviations that arise in production [9].

Continuous Monitoring and Feedback Loops

After deployment, continuous monitoring tools provide ongoing compliance insights. These tools validate that policies remain enforced in production, offering visibility into the compliance status of all deployed resources and applications [2].

Developers receive instant notifications about violations, complete with remediation guidance, while aggregated reports help teams identify patterns and improve processes. Compliance dashboards offer executives a high-level view of compliance across projects and environments.

Automated reporting and APIs generate detailed compliance metrics, such as violation frequency and severity. This data enables teams to refine policies based on actual usage, reducing false positives and improving overall effectiveness [6]. Continuous monitoring creates a feedback loop, where teams adjust practices based on insights, leading to better compliance over time.

Policy-as-Code solutions also support industry standards like PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and CIS Benchmarks [7]. Tools such as Open Policy Agent (OPA) allow for custom checks, while platforms like Prisma Cloud embed security policies directly into Infrastructure-as-Code, enabling enforcement across cloud and hybrid environments [2][10].

For organisations aiming to streamline their CI/CD pipelines, Hokstad Consulting provides expert advice on integrating Policy-as-Code strategies to achieve automated compliance and improved security.

Best Practices for Policy-as-Code Implementation

Implementing Policy-as-Code effectively requires a careful balance between meeting compliance needs and maintaining developer productivity. Rushing into it without a clear plan often leads to resistance from teams and disruptions to workflows. Instead, a structured approach - one that incorporates gradual adoption, smart policy organisation, and collaboration across teams - lays the groundwork for success. Building on the advantages and mechanics already discussed, these practices ensure that Policy-as-Code becomes a seamless part of compliance efforts.

Gradual Enforcement Strategy

Jumping straight into strict enforcement can backfire. Teams need time to understand new policies and adjust their workflows. A better starting point is using WARN mode for non-critical policies. This mode flags violations without halting deployments, giving developers real-time feedback during the development process [6].

During this phase, teams can track which policies are most frequently triggered, assess the nature of violations, and gather input on whether the policies are practical or overly restrictive. Once teams are familiar with the policies and violations decrease, critical policies can shift to ERROR mode, which blocks non-compliant code from moving forward [2][6]. This phased method not only eases resistance but also shows developers that their feedback matters, rather than imposing rigid rules from the top down.

The timeline for transitioning from WARN to ERROR mode will vary by organisation. It’s wise to keep policies in WARN mode during the initial rollout while monitoring key metrics like violation frequency, remediation times, and developer feedback. These insights help determine when teams are ready for stricter enforcement.

Policy Grouping and Environment Segmentation

Managing individual policies becomes increasingly complex as organisations grow. One way to simplify this is by grouping related policies into Policy Sets. This centralised approach makes it easier to maintain and update policies [6]. Organising policies around specific compliance needs creates a logical structure that reduces management headaches [6].

Policy grouping also ensures consistent enforcement across different pipelines and environments [2][6]. For example, development environments can have more lenient policies to encourage testing and rapid iteration, while production environments should enforce stricter rules to safeguard live systems. This tailored approach aligns enforcement levels with the risk profiles of each environment.

For organisations juggling multiple compliance frameworks like PCI DSS, HIPAA, or SOX, grouping policies by standard simplifies audits and reporting. Compliance-based Policy Sets provide a single, organised view of all relevant rules, making it easier to demonstrate adherence [7]. Custom policies addressing unique organisational needs should undergo thorough testing in staging environments before being applied to production, minimising the risk of disruptions [6].

Stakeholder Collaboration and Documentation

While automation is a key part of Policy-as-Code, its success also hinges on clear communication and collaboration. Bringing together developers, operations, security, and compliance teams during policy creation ensures that policies are both practical and aligned with regulatory requirements [2]. This cross-functional approach fosters accountability and ensures policies address real-world constraints [2].

Regular reviews with all stakeholders help keep policies relevant as business needs evolve [6]. Scheduled meetings and open communication channels provide a space to discuss challenges, share feedback, and make improvements.

Documentation plays a crucial role in adoption. A centralised repository where all policies are clearly documented, versioned, and searchable ensures teams can easily find what they need [6]. Policies should be written in a way that’s understandable to both technical and non-technical audiences, explaining not just the requirements but also their purpose and compliance goals [4]. This repository should evolve alongside the policies it houses. Training sessions and workshops further help teams understand and integrate new policies into their workflows [6].

It’s worth noting that human error was responsible for 84% of cybersecurity incidents in 2021. This highlights the importance of proper training and clear documentation in reducing risks [4].

Finally, organisations should set up feedback mechanisms for developers to report issues or suggest policy improvements. This two-way communication ensures policies remain practical, supporting both compliance and innovation.

For tailored strategies on integrating Policy-as-Code into CI/CD pipelines, Hokstad Consulting offers DevOps transformation services designed to balance compliance needs with development speed.

Governance and Compliance: Strengthening Organisational Standards

A strong governance framework is key to ensuring organisational compliance, and Policy-as-Code takes this a step further by embedding compliance rules directly into CI/CD pipelines. This automation ensures that every deployment aligns with internal standards and regulatory requirements, making compliance an integral part of the development process.

These policies act as guardrails, ensuring that changes to code or infrastructure meet established standards before they reach production. By catching compliance issues early - when they are easier and cheaper to address - organisations can avoid the higher costs and risks associated with fixing problems later in the process.

Preventative and Detective Controls

Policy-as-Code employs two types of controls to maintain compliance: preventative controls and detective controls. These work together to create a comprehensive governance framework.

• Preventative controls stop non-compliant changes before they happen. For example, enforcement mechanisms like ERROR mode can halt a pipeline the moment a policy violation is detected. If a policy requires cryptographic signing of artefacts, any unsigned code would immediately stop the pipeline. These controls also ensure uniform naming conventions and configurations, restrict the use of unauthorised connectors, and prevent changes to critical settings like approval workflows or deployment targets.

• Detective controls monitor systems and configurations after deployment to identify any policy drift. For instance, they might track production databases to ensure encryption settings remain correct, alerting security teams if deviations occur. This real-time monitoring provides ongoing visibility and helps identify emerging risks or inadvertent changes.

By combining these controls, organisations can reduce risks early while maintaining continuous oversight. Preventative measures catch issues before they escalate, while detective controls provide a safety net, ensuring that any missed issues are quickly identified and addressed.

Regulatory Compliance Integration

Policy-as-Code also simplifies adherence to regulatory standards like GDPR, ISO 27001, and other industry-specific frameworks. Instead of treating compliance as a separate, manual task, these requirements are embedded directly into the development and deployment processes, ensuring they are automatically verified at every stage of the CI/CD pipeline.

For example:

• A GDPR-aligned policy might enforce encryption for customer data both in transit and at rest.
• ISO 27001 compliance can be supported through policies enforcing security tagging, approval workflows, and audit trails.
• Automation tools using Policy-as-Code can ensure server configurations meet multiple standards simultaneously, such as PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOX, DISA STIG, and CIS Benchmarks.

By the time code reaches production, it has already been validated against all relevant regulatory requirements, reducing the risk of non-compliance and potential penalties. Policies can also enforce encryption settings, role-based access controls (RBAC), and other safeguards, ensuring compliance is maintained without slowing down development.

Policy Sets tailored to different environments add another layer of flexibility. For instance, development environments may allow lenient warnings, while production environments enforce strict blocking. These sets also streamline audits by grouping policies based on specific regulatory or security requirements, such as encryption or approval processes, ensuring consistency across environments while accommodating unique needs.

In large, complex organisations, Policy-as-Code helps maintain consistency, repeatability, and scalability. It addresses challenges like policy drift and ensures that all changes follow the same rules, a critical advantage for businesses operating across multiple regions or units.

Hokstad Consulting integrates these governance measures into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring organisations can achieve compliance without compromising development speed or agility.

Conclusion: Implementing Policy-as-Code for Long-Term Success

Policy-as-Code shifts compliance from being a tedious, manual task to an automated process that drives efficiency. By integrating governance directly into CI/CD pipelines, organisations can ensure consistency, scalability, and reliability, even in highly complex IT setups[7]. This approach lays the foundation for a practical and effective Policy-as-Code strategy.

Many organisations adopting Policy-as-Code report noticeable cost savings and improved efficiency. Early detection of policy violations allows teams to address issues when they are simpler and less expensive to fix, avoiding the financial and operational headaches of post-deployment errors or compliance penalties[2]. Over time, these operational gains add up. Development cycles speed up, manual compliance checks are minimised, and automation reduces human error and downtime caused by infrastructure issues[1][2][4].

To start with Policy-as-Code, define clear, measurable goals that align with your most pressing compliance needs[2]. Encourage collaboration among developers, operations, and security teams, ensuring that all viewpoints shape your policy definitions[2]. Consider a phased approach, beginning with policies set to WARN mode. This flags violations without disrupting workflows, giving teams the opportunity to adapt before moving to ERROR mode, where violations block pipelines[6].

Measure key metrics such as compliance violation rates, remediation times, and improvements in development cycles to assess the effectiveness of Policy-as-Code[2][3]. Ongoing monitoring ensures continued benefits, such as catching issues early and enhancing operational efficiency.

The benefits of Policy-as-Code go beyond immediate gains. Policies written as code can be reused and enforced across numerous services without significantly increasing manual effort[4][5]. As organisations adopt multicloud or hybrid environments, Policy-as-Code ensures consistent governance across expanding infrastructures without creating bottlenecks[4]. Regular policy reviews with input from key stakeholders help keep policies aligned with evolving business needs[6].

FAQs