Runtime security for containers ensures your CI/CD pipelines remain safe during deployment and operation. Unlike build-time security, which addresses vulnerabilities early, runtime security focuses on detecting and mitigating threats as containers run. This is critical because modern pipelines, with their rapid deployments and shared resources, are exposed to risks like privilege escalation, malicious code, and misconfigurations.
Key Takeaways:
- Why it matters: CI/CD pipelines are fast but can introduce risks like compromised images or exposed secrets during runtime.
- Top threats: Privilege escalation, tampered images, runtime misconfigurations, and leaked credentials are common.
- Solutions: Use tools like Falco, Aqua Security, and Sysdig Secure for real-time monitoring, enforce least privilege policies, and integrate automated vulnerability scanning.
- Best practices: Continuously monitor container behaviour, secure secrets, and implement Zero Trust principles to minimise risks.
By embedding security at every stage of the pipeline and automating threat detection, you can maintain deployment speed while protecting your systems.
Hands-on guide to Runtime Security for CI/CD Pipelines with StepSecurity

Main Risks and Problems in Container Runtime Security
Container runtime security is fraught with challenges that can disrupt CI/CD pipelines and leave systems vulnerable to attacks. Addressing these risks is crucial to maintaining a secure and efficient development environment.
Common Attack Methods in Container Runtime
Attackers often target vulnerabilities that arise during container runtime. For instance, insecure container images - loaded with malware or outdated libraries - can bypass checks performed at build time. While these images may seem safe during initial scans, they can activate malicious code once in runtime.
Another significant issue is poor secrets management. Hardcoded secrets, unsafe storage of credentials, and failure to rotate keys can expose systems to unauthorised access, providing attackers with a direct route into production environments.
Weak access controls and misconfigured containers are also common culprits. When containers are granted excessive privileges, attackers can escalate privileges within clusters or even compromise the host system, violating the principle of least privilege.
A stark example occurred in 2020 when UK organisations were targeted through exposed Docker APIs. Attackers deployed cryptomining containers, leading to resource theft and operational downtime[2]. This highlights how runtime vulnerabilities can have serious consequences.
Supply chain attacks add another layer of risk. Attackers may compromise widely used libraries or base images by embedding malicious code that remains dormant until runtime. This tactic allows them to bypass static analysis tools typically used during the build phase.
Problems Created by CI/CD Automation
CI/CD automation, while essential for modern development, introduces its own set of vulnerabilities. The speed and scale of automated pipelines can sometimes outpace security measures. Rapid deployments may skip thorough reviews, allowing vulnerabilities to persist unnoticed through multiple pipeline stages.
Automated processes can also amplify the spread of vulnerabilities. With hundreds or even thousands of containers deployed simultaneously, security teams may struggle to monitor activity in real time, leaving room for malicious actions to go undetected.
The complexity of managing large-scale pipelines further increases the risk of misconfigurations or the use of unverified third-party components. Manual oversight becomes nearly impossible, and errors can propagate quickly.
Additionally, the pressure to maintain fast deployment cycles often creates tension between security protocols and business goals. Development teams might bypass security checks or take shortcuts, introducing vulnerabilities when security is seen as an obstacle to speed.
Another issue is the inconsistent integration of security into automated workflows. When security tools and checks are not embedded at every stage of the pipeline, vulnerabilities can accumulate as code moves from development to production.
Risk Reduction Methods
Reducing these risks requires a layered approach that addresses vulnerabilities across the container lifecycle. Continuous monitoring is a key strategy. By tracking container behaviour, system calls, and network traffic in real time, security teams can quickly spot and respond to anomalies.
Automated vulnerability scanning should be a constant process, not something done at isolated points. Modern tools can scan both container images and running containers for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and compliance issues, ensuring only secure containers reach production.
Proper secrets management is another critical measure. Tools like HashiCorp Vault and AWS Secrets Manager provide centralised, secure storage for credentials, along with automated rotation and audit trails. This reduces the risks tied to hardcoded secrets.
The principle of least privilege should be strictly enforced. Containers should operate with minimal permissions, using low-privilege users, restricted network access, and policy-driven controls to limit potential damage from breaches.
Real-time threat detection tools, such as SIEM or SOAR platforms, can identify and respond to suspicious activity automatically. Machine learning can further enhance detection by identifying novel threats that traditional methods might miss.
Regularly updating base images and applying security patches promptly helps address known vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. Additionally, having incident response playbooks tailored to CI/CD environments ensures that teams can quickly contain and recover from security incidents.
These measures can be implemented without disrupting deployment processes. Together, they set the stage for the practical solutions discussed in the next section.
Best Practices for Runtime Security Implementation
To achieve robust runtime security, a well-structured approach is essential - one that combines protection with operational efficiency. These practices are key to securing containerised environments while keeping up with the fast pace of CI/CD pipelines.
Continuous Monitoring and Threat Detection
Keeping an eye on your system in real time is your first line of defence against runtime threats. System call analysis plays a crucial role here, tracking container activities. If a container attempts to make an unexpected system call - like accessing restricted files or running unusual processes - it could signal a compromise.
Log monitoring is another vital tool, creating a detailed record of container activity. Advanced platforms like Splunk and IBM QRadar can gather and analyse logs across your systems, helping to identify suspicious activity. For instance, detecting unexpected network connections or privilege escalations can alert you to an active attack.
Machine learning takes monitoring up a notch by identifying deviations from normal behaviour. By analysing patterns in resource usage, network traffic, and application activity, these systems can detect new attack methods that might bypass traditional defences.
To make this process seamless, integrate monitoring tools directly into your CI/CD workflows. Automated alerts ensure security teams are notified immediately of any anomalies, while tools like Slack or Microsoft Teams can keep development teams informed without disrupting their work. Adding strict access controls to these tools further secures your pipeline.
Enforcing Minimal Privileges and Access Controls
The principle of least privilege is a cornerstone of container security. Running containers as non-root users and implementing role-based access control (RBAC) reduces the risk of privilege escalation.
RBAC allows for detailed control over who can access what within your CI/CD environment. For example, Kubernetes supports policies that limit access to only what’s necessary, enabling developers to deploy applications without requiring administrative privileges in production.
Separating responsibilities between development and operations teams adds another layer of security. Developers can focus on building and testing containers, while operations teams handle deployment, reducing the chance of accidental or malicious changes to critical systems.
Access controls should also cover service accounts and automated processes. Every component in your CI/CD pipeline should operate with only the permissions it absolutely needs, creating multiple barriers to potential breaches.
Automated Vulnerability Scanning and Secrets Management
Automated security scans are a must at every stage of your CI/CD pipeline. Tools like SonarQube, Checkmarx, and Trivy can analyse both static code and running containers, ensuring vulnerabilities are caught early, well before they reach production.
When it comes to managing secrets, relying on ad-hoc methods is risky. Dedicated tools like HashiCorp Vault and AWS Secrets Manager provide secure storage for credentials, API keys, and certificates. These tools also enforce rotation policies and maintain detailed audit logs for added security.
Automated secret scanning tools are another safeguard, preventing sensitive data - like hardcoded passwords or API keys - from being committed to your repositories. By integrating these checks through pre-commit hooks, you can enhance security without slowing down deployments.
Incident Response and Containment
Having a plan in place for incidents is critical. Develop CI/CD-specific playbooks and automate responses like quarantining compromised containers to quickly contain breaches and limit damage.
Testing recovery procedures regularly is just as important. Clean backups, effective rollbacks, and clear communication are essential components of a solid recovery strategy. Conducting drills or tabletop exercises helps teams refine their responses and adapt to evolving security challenges.
Building on these measures, applying Zero Trust principles ensures an additional layer of protection across your deployment cycle.
Using Zero Trust Principles
Zero Trust principles focus on verifying every action and minimising the risk of lateral movement during an attack. Network segmentation is a key part of this, restricting communication between containers to limit the spread of potential threats. Service mesh technologies can enforce mutual TLS and granular access policies between microservices, ensuring that even a compromised container can’t easily affect other parts of your system.
Policy-as-code provides consistent and precise control. By defining and managing policies alongside your applications, you can maintain consistency and version control across your environment.
Continuous validation of container behaviour against established baselines is another critical step. This ensures that containers operate within their defined parameters throughout their lifecycle, not just at deployment.
Zero Trust principles also apply to your entire CI/CD pipeline. Build agents, deployment tools, and monitoring systems should all be subject to the same strict controls and validations.
For organisations looking to implement these best practices, expert consultancies like Hokstad Consulting offer tailored guidance and strategic support to secure your CI/CD pipelines effectively.
Need help optimizing your cloud costs?
Get expert advice on how to reduce your cloud expenses without sacrificing performance.
Tools and Solutions for Runtime Security in CI/CD
In today's fast-paced development landscape, runtime security tools are essential for safeguarding containerised environments without compromising the efficiency of your CI/CD pipelines. Choosing the right security solution requires a clear understanding of each tool's strengths, limitations, and how they align with your organisation's needs.
Overview of Leading Security Tools
Falco is a standout open-source tool for runtime security. Developed by Sysdig and now part of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, it offers real-time threat detection by monitoring system calls. It's particularly effective in Kubernetes environments, identifying activities like unauthorised file access or unexpected process launches. With customisation options, it’s a great fit for teams with specific security needs or constrained budgets.
Aqua Security provides a robust commercial platform that combines vulnerability scanning, runtime protection, and compliance management. It integrates seamlessly with major CI/CD systems and features a user-friendly interface, simplifying security operations. Aqua Security is especially adept at preventing supply chain attacks by scanning container images for vulnerabilities and enforcing runtime policies before deployment.
Sysdig Secure builds on Falco’s capabilities, offering enterprise-grade features like advanced analytics and compliance reporting. It supports Kubernetes, Docker, and various cloud environments, delivering comprehensive visibility across hybrid infrastructures.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is designed for multi-cloud environments, offering consistent security policies across cloud providers and on-premises setups. Its container protection capabilities make it an excellent choice for large enterprises with complex, distributed architectures.
These tools cater to a range of needs, from open-source flexibility to enterprise-level security, making them suitable for diverse organisational requirements.
Comparison of Runtime Security Tools
| Tool | Supported Environments | Detection | Integration | Ease of Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falco | Kubernetes, Docker, Linux | Yes | Manual/Scripted | Moderate (CLI-based) |
| Aqua Security | Kubernetes, Docker, Cloud | Yes | Native plugins | High (UI & API) |
| Sysdig Secure | Kubernetes, Docker, Linux | Yes | Native plugins | High (UI & API) |
| Prisma Cloud | Kubernetes, Docker, Cloud | Yes | Native plugins | High (UI & API) |
This table highlights the key differences among these tools. While Falco offers extensive customisation, it requires more manual configuration and CLI proficiency. On the other hand, commercial options like Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure, and Prisma Cloud provide broader cloud support, intuitive interfaces, and advanced integrations. These features make them ideal for enterprises prioritising ease of deployment and management.
Most leading tools integrate smoothly with popular CI/CD platforms like Jenkins, GitLab CI, and GitHub Actions. This is typically achieved through native plugins or APIs, enabling automated scanning of container images, monitoring of runtime behaviour, and enforcement of security policies during build, test, and deployment stages [1].
For organisations in the UK, compliance is a critical factor. Tools like Aqua Security and Prisma Cloud offer features such as audit logging, compliance reporting, and policy enforcement aligned with GDPR and ISO/IEC 27001 standards. These capabilities ensure secure handling of sensitive data, maintain detailed records of security events, and automate compliance checks throughout the CI/CD pipeline.
Using Tailored Consulting Services
Selecting and implementing runtime security tools can be a complex process, often requiring expertise beyond what in-house teams can provide. This is where consulting services become invaluable, helping organisations navigate the intricate balance between security, performance, and cost.
Hokstad Consulting specialises in customised solutions for DevOps transformation, cloud cost optimisation, and security automation, including runtime security for containers. Their team helps organisations design security controls tailored to specific CI/CD workflows, integrate advanced tools, and maintain deployment speed without compromising security.
Consultants also play a key role in simplifying tool integration by selecting solutions with strong documentation and native CI/CD support. They provide tailored implementation strategies, ongoing training, and assistance in measuring effectiveness through metrics like tracked threats, incident response times, and compliance audit results.
Additionally, consulting services offer strategic guidance on compliance requirements, cloud migration, and AI-driven security automation. By aligning security solutions with local business needs and regulatory standards, they ensure optimal outcomes. Many consulting models are cost-effective, tying fees to client savings, which aligns their incentives with your organisation’s security and efficiency goals.
Adding Runtime Security to CI/CD Pipelines
Integrating runtime security into CI/CD pipelines requires embedding protection at every stage while keeping deployments fast and efficient. The secret lies in automation, well-placed security controls, and continuously refining your approach.
Building Security Controls into Pipelines
Start at the Source Stage: Use tools like static code analysis (e.g., SonarQube, Checkmarx) triggered on commits to catch issues early. Enforce branch protection, require pull request reviews, and set up pre-commit hooks to block hardcoded secrets before they enter your codebase.
At the Build Stage: Run automated scans for dependencies and container images to identify vulnerabilities, malware, and misconfigurations. These scans can work in parallel to avoid slowing down the build process.
During Testing: Incorporate tools like DAST and IAST to uncover runtime vulnerabilities that static analysis might miss. Configure builds to fail if critical issues are detected, ensuring problems are addressed before moving forward.
At Deployment: Implement access controls and policy gates to verify compliance before deployment. Activate runtime monitoring immediately to establish behavioural baselines, helping to detect anomalies later.
These measures integrate smoothly into CI/CD workflows, enabling secure yet rapid deployments. By automating these processes, you can maintain deployment speed. Tools that connect directly to your CI/CD platform via plugins or APIs can provide real-time feedback to developers through channels like Slack, Microsoft Teams, or email. This immediate feedback loop allows developers to fix issues quickly without manual intervention [1][6].
Balancing Security with Deployment Speed
Once controls are in place, maintaining a balance between security and speed becomes essential.
Shift-Left Security tackles vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle, embedding security into the process rather than treating it as an afterthought. This approach reduces both the cost and time of fixing issues compared to addressing them in production [2].
Parallel Scanning ensures security checks don’t slow down the pipeline. Lightweight scans can run continuously, while more thorough scans happen alongside build processes. Tools can prioritise critical vulnerabilities, allowing lower-risk issues to be addressed later without blocking deployments.
Risk-Based Policies focus on addressing the most urgent threats. Security gates can block critical and high-severity vulnerabilities while tracking medium and low-risk issues for future remediation.
For example, combining shift-left practices with parallel scanning can significantly reduce deployment times while maintaining a high level of security.
Modern tools also use machine learning to detect anomalies, such as off-hours commits or unusual resource usage, without disrupting regular operations.
Automated Incident Response further enhances security without pausing the pipeline. By connecting security tools with SIEM/SOAR platforms, you can automatically isolate compromised containers, roll back deployments, or trigger emergency responses when threats are detected [1].
Role of Continuous Improvement in Security
Even with robust controls, continuous improvement ensures your defences stay effective against new challenges.
Regular Policy Reviews help adapt to evolving threats. Conduct monthly reviews of your security policies, incorporating the latest threat intelligence and lessons from recent incidents. This keeps your security up-to-date and effective [3].
Metrics-Driven Optimisation provides a clear picture of your security programme's performance. Track indicators like the number of vulnerabilities addressed per release, mean time to detect (MTTD) and respond (MTTR) to incidents, and the ratio of false positives to true positives [1][3].
Feedback Integration from incident reviews can lead to meaningful changes. Use lessons learned to update policies, adjust tool configurations, or improve training programmes, ensuring recurring issues are avoided and overall security is strengthened.
Red Team Exercises test your defences under realistic attack scenarios. These simulated attacks can expose gaps in your detection and response capabilities, offering valuable insights for improvement [2].
Tool and Configuration Updates are essential to counter emerging threats. Regularly update your security tools, vulnerability databases, and policy configurations. Automating these updates can help maintain protection without adding manual effort.
Cross-Team Collaboration is key to aligning security with business goals. Regular communication between security, development, and operations teams ensures improvements are identified and implemented without compromising deployment speed [1][2].
By focusing on data-driven reviews, automated compliance checks (e.g., GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001), and regular audits, you can validate and enhance your security measures over time.
For personalised advice on implementing these strategies, consider consulting experts like Hokstad Consulting.
Conclusion: Securing Containers in CI/CD Pipelines
Ensuring runtime security for containers is essential to maintaining fast and reliable CI/CD deployments while staying ahead of ever-changing threats. With supply chain attacks projected to cost a staggering £60 billion globally by 2025, the financial risks of inadequate security have never been more pressing [7].
Key Takeaways for Strengthening Runtime Security
One of the most important lessons in runtime security is that protection must span the entire container lifecycle. Recent incidents highlight the need for dynamic, real-time measures to catch threats that traditional security tools might miss [2][3].
Automation plays a vital role in maintaining security without compromising deployment speed. Tools like vulnerability scanners and real-time monitoring can significantly reduce the mean time to detect (MTTD) and respond (MTTR). This not only minimises downtime but also cuts the financial impact of breaches [1][3].
Continuous monitoring and threat detection are the cornerstones of effective runtime security. By establishing behavioural baselines and identifying anomalies - such as unauthorised access or unexpected resource consumption - teams can respond to threats immediately, instead of discovering them long after damage is done [3][4]. Integrating tools like SIEM or SOAR with pipeline logs enables automatic threat detection and response, often stopping incidents before they escalate [1].
Implementing least privilege policies reduces the attack surface significantly. Running containers as non-root users, enforcing strict access controls, and limiting container capabilities make it harder for attackers to exploit vulnerabilities [2][3]. Coupled with robust secrets management and regular credential rotation, these measures create a multi-layered defence that’s difficult to penetrate.
Zero Trust principles - never trust, always verify
- align perfectly with the dynamic nature of modern CI/CD environments. Continuous validation of every access request ensures that security adapts to evolving deployment practices [2].
These practices establish a strong foundation, but expert input can elevate security strategies even further.
Why Expert Guidance Matters
While these principles provide a solid start, expert guidance is often essential for refining and implementing a comprehensive runtime security strategy. Tailored solutions, strategic planning, and ongoing fine-tuning help organisations address their unique risks without compromising the agility that makes CI/CD pipelines so valuable [2].
For organisations in the UK, navigating compliance requirements like GDPR adds another layer of complexity. Automated compliance checks, detailed audit logs, and secure handling of secrets aren’t just good security practices - they’re legal obligations [2][5].
Hokstad Consulting offers expertise in these areas, blending DevOps transformation with cloud cost optimisation to deliver security solutions that are both effective and efficient. Their ability to integrate custom automation and optimise cloud infrastructure ensures robust runtime security without sacrificing performance.
As previously discussed, automated security measures are indispensable, but it’s the experience of expert consultants that ensures these measures are implemented seamlessly. Hidden risks, such as exposed secrets or unsafe practices, can be difficult to detect without specialised knowledge [1]. Expert consultants help identify and mitigate these risks while preserving workflow efficiency.
Securing containers in CI/CD pipelines isn’t a one-time task - it’s an ongoing effort that requires vigilance and adaptability. By combining embedded security measures, automated monitoring, and expert guidance, organisations can maintain the speed and agility of their deployments while building strong defences against emerging threats.
FAQs
What is the difference between runtime security and build-time security in CI/CD pipelines?
Runtime security is all about keeping an eye on containers while they’re running, ensuring any vulnerabilities are spotted and dealt with immediately. This approach is crucial for maintaining protection in dynamic and often unpredictable environments.
On the other hand, build-time security takes place earlier in the process. It involves catching and fixing issues during development - things like scanning container images for weaknesses or analysing code before it’s deployed. The key difference? Runtime security protects containers in action, while build-time security stops problems from reaching production in the first place.
How can runtime security tools be integrated into CI/CD workflows without delaying deployments?
To incorporate runtime security tools while keeping deployment speeds intact, focus on lightweight agents that operate within containers. Automating security scans during both the build and deployment phases is another smart move. This approach ensures that security is baked into the process without slowing things down.
Using container-native solutions is key - they offer real-time monitoring and automatically enforce security policies, seamlessly fitting into your workflows with minimal interference.
For an extra layer of efficiency, asynchronous runtime security tools can run quietly in the background, preserving system performance. Combined with automated policy enforcement, this ensures robust protection without requiring constant manual oversight. These methods strike the perfect balance between strong security and smooth deployments.
What is the principle of least privilege in container runtime security, and why does it matter?
The principle of least privilege plays a crucial role in container runtime security. By restricting permissions to only what a container truly needs to operate, it significantly lowers the risk of potential attacks. This approach helps to limit the damage caused if a container is compromised, such as blocking privilege escalation or preventing unauthorised access.
To put this into practice, containers should be set up to run as non-root users, with strict access controls applied. Tools like SELinux and AppArmor can enforce these policies effectively, adding an extra layer of protection. Regularly auditing permissions ensures that security configurations remain intact and up to date. Additionally, automation tools can be leveraged to maintain consistent policy enforcement, reducing the chance of human error and strengthening security overall.