CDN optimisation is key to delivering smooth video streaming. Whether you're managing a single-CDN setup or a multi-CDN strategy, the goal is the same: faster delivery, reduced buffering, and lower costs. Here's what you need to know:
- Single-CDN setups: Simplify management, reduce latency, and cut bandwidth costs by caching content closer to viewers. Ideal for smaller-scale operations or regional audiences like in the UK.
- Multi-CDN strategies: Improve reliability and scalability by distributing traffic across several providers. Best for large-scale or global streaming, especially during high-demand events.
- Key techniques: Intelligent caching, better routing, and advanced protocols (e.g., HTTP/2, QUIC) ensure seamless playback and cost savings.
- Hokstad Consulting: Offers tailored solutions, saving businesses up to 50% on costs while improving streaming performance.
Quick takeaway: Single-CDN is easier to manage but less resilient, while multi-CDN is more robust but complex. Choose based on your audience size, budget, and performance needs.
Optimize website videos with Uploadcare CDN & adaptive bitrate streaming
1. Single-CDN Strategies
When it comes to single-CDN strategies, the focus is on leveraging a single content delivery network (CDN) provider for global video distribution. This approach simplifies management, offers predictable costs, and optimises performance within a unified infrastructure. By caching video segments at various quality levels across multiple edge locations, a single CDN reduces the strain on origin servers while efficiently delivering content to viewers.
Latency Reduction
Reducing latency is a key advantage of a single-CDN setup. By caching video content at edge servers located closer to end-users, requests are routed to the nearest server instead of the distant origin. This proximity speeds up the delivery of video segments and enables faster bitrate adjustments, ensuring minimal delays.
For instance, during a live sports broadcast, the CDN directs viewer requests to the nearest edge server, delivering initial video segments almost instantly. This setup allows the video player to quickly assess network conditions and adjust quality without interruptions like buffering.
Technical configurations play a big role here. Shortening video segments from 6 seconds to 2–4 seconds allows quicker bitrate adaptations, making playback smoother even when bandwidth fluctuates. Additionally, modern protocols like HTTP/2 or QUIC improve transfer speeds compared to standard HTTP, further reducing latency. The adoption of CMAF (Common Media Application Format) can bring latency for HLS and DASH streams down to under 3 seconds, supporting quicker quality shifts and smoother playback. A CDN supporting multiple streaming protocols - such as HLS, DASH, and Smooth Streaming - ensures compatibility with various players.
These latency improvements don't just enhance viewing experiences; they also contribute to cost savings by optimising delivery efficiency.
Cost Efficiency
A single-CDN strategy can significantly lower bandwidth costs through efficient content caching and delivery. By storing frequently accessed content at edge servers, the need for repeated origin server requests is reduced. This minimises data transfer costs and makes delivery more economical.
Adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR) further optimises bandwidth usage. Instead of always transmitting high-bitrate streams, ABR dynamically adjusts the video quality to match the viewer’s network conditions and device capabilities. This prevents unnecessary data consumption, ensuring only the required quality is delivered.
Another benefit is the simplicity of working with a single provider. Managing one vendor relationship reduces administrative overhead, and many CDN providers offer flexible pricing models based on actual bandwidth usage, which is particularly useful for smaller-scale operations. For organisations with limited resources, this streamlined approach simplifies budgeting and cost management.
However, storage demands must be carefully considered. A single CDN needs enough capacity at its edge locations to store multiple bitrate versions of popular content. While this increases infrastructure costs, it supports seamless ABR functionality and reduces the load on origin servers. For smaller streaming services or regional broadcasters in the UK, these advantages make a single-CDN strategy practical. A provider with a strong presence in the UK and Europe can optimise performance for local audiences while keeping operations manageable.
Scalability
Scalability can be a challenge for single-CDN strategies, especially during peak traffic periods. When viewer numbers surge - such as during major live events - CDN infrastructure might struggle to maintain consistent quality for all viewers. If the system becomes overloaded, it could lead to buffering or degraded video quality.
For example, during a high-profile live event with millions of viewers, edge servers in certain regions may hit capacity limits, forcing the system to queue requests or aggressively lower quality. Additionally, a single CDN may lack sufficient coverage in some regions, leading to higher latency and slower adaptation for viewers in those areas.
To address these issues, load balancing is essential. By distributing traffic across a hierarchy of cache locations, the CDN ensures that frequently accessed content is readily available at edge servers, while less popular content is stored at regional or origin-level servers. This approach minimises latency and ensures smoother playback.
The composition of the ABR ladder - essentially the range of available bitrate and resolution options - also requires careful management. A single CDN adjusts this ladder based on real-time performance data, ensuring it aligns with regional capabilities. Poorly optimised ladders can lead to either excessive buffering or limited quality options, so finding the right balance is crucial.
Performance Monitoring
Continuous monitoring is vital for optimising single-CDN ABR delivery. Key metrics like bandwidth availability and buffer status should be tracked in real-time, as they directly influence the ABR algorithm’s decisions. Rebuffering events, which disrupt viewing experiences, must be minimised through proactive strategies like maintaining sufficient buffer levels.
Performance should also be analysed across different regions and ISPs to identify network-specific issues. This data can guide adjustments to the ABR ladder, ensuring smooth quality transitions and minimising disruptions. For UK-based providers, regional performance monitoring is particularly important. Analysing variations across ISPs and network conditions specific to the UK market can help prioritise edge storage for popular content, reducing origin server load and improving efficiency.
2. Multi-CDN Strategies
Multi-CDN strategies involve using multiple CDN providers simultaneously to distribute content. Instead of depending on a single provider's infrastructure, this approach spreads traffic across several networks to improve reliability, performance, and reach. By doing so, organisations can avoid being locked into one vendor and reduce the risk of service disruptions caused by issues with a single provider. This method is particularly effective for ensuring smooth ABR streaming, as it helps mitigate regional congestion and dependency on individual vendors[2].
The system works by leveraging real-time performance data to switch between providers. If one CDN encounters congestion or performance issues, traffic is automatically redirected to another provider, ensuring viewers experience consistent quality. This adds redundancy and flexibility, complementing single-CDN setups to maintain uninterrupted service[5].
Latency Reduction
Multi-CDN solutions help cut latency by using geographic redundancy and smart routing. When a viewer requests content, the system directs them to the nearest available edge server from any participating CDN network, speeding up delivery.
AI-powered algorithms take this a step further by analysing live network conditions and choosing the best server for each user. This ensures minimal delay even during high-traffic periods or in areas with inconsistent internet speeds. For UK audiences, combining global providers with local partnerships helps maintain stable streaming performance[6][5].
Manifest files, such as M3U8 for HLS or MPD for DASH, are key to coordinating multi-CDN environments. They can be dynamically generated to guide user requests to the most suitable CDN based on real-time data and location. Modern protocols like CMAF further enhance this setup by reducing HLS and DASH delays to under 3 seconds, allowing for rapid adjustments to network changes across multiple CDNs[3][6][5].
Cost Efficiency
Using a multi-CDN approach can also reduce costs. By distributing traffic among several providers, organisations can negotiate better pricing and avoid being tied to a single vendor's rates. Additionally, this strategy allows for cost optimisation by selecting the most economical provider for specific regions or traffic patterns. Partnerships with regional telecom providers can further lower delivery costs[5][2].
While managing multiple providers does add complexity - such as dealing with different billing systems - the financial benefits are clear. Distributed caching significantly reduces the load on origin servers, lowering bandwidth expenses. By caching content at various edge locations, requests rarely need to reach the origin server. Combined with competitive provider rates, this strategy maximises savings compared to single-CDN setups[2].
Scalability
Multi-CDN strategies excel at handling large numbers of concurrent viewers, especially during peak events. Unlike single-CDN setups, which can struggle under heavy traffic, spreading the load across multiple providers prevents any single network from becoming overwhelmed. This ensures high-quality adaptive streams, even during major surges in viewer numbers[2].
Dynamic adaptive caching plays a crucial role in maintaining performance during unexpected traffic spikes. The system can predict demand patterns and adjust routing in real time, delivering content more efficiently. Intelligent load balancing ensures traffic is directed away from congested providers to those with available capacity, guaranteeing smooth playback for all viewers[5][6].
Performance Monitoring
To maintain quality, rigorous performance monitoring is essential in a multi-CDN setup. Organisations should track key metrics like latency, packet loss, and buffer status for adaptive bitrate streams. Monitoring regional delivery metrics helps identify performance variations, while automated alerts can signal when a provider's performance drops below acceptable levels, enabling immediate rerouting of traffic[7][6][2].
Regular performance reports comparing each CDN's speed, reliability, and cost-per-gigabyte provide valuable insights for optimising traffic distribution. Analysing ABR algorithms - whether throughput-based, buffer-based, or hybrid - helps fine-tune bitrate selection across varying conditions and providers. Comprehensive logging and monitoring across all systems make it easier to troubleshoot issues, while clear service level agreements with each provider ensure consistent quality standards[3][6][2]. Though managing multiple APIs and billing systems adds complexity, the detailed insights gained are crucial for refining delivery strategies over time.
Need help optimizing your cloud costs?
Get expert advice on how to reduce your cloud expenses without sacrificing performance.
3. Hokstad Consulting Solutions

Hokstad Consulting takes multi-CDN strategies a step further, crafting tailored, cost-conscious solutions that optimise adaptive bitrate streaming. Their focus lies in combining DevOps practices, cloud cost engineering, and infrastructure planning to streamline the entire delivery process. By identifying inefficiencies and balancing performance with cost management, they help organisations build smarter streaming systems that adjust to real-world demands without overspending.
Cost Efficiency
At the heart of Hokstad Consulting’s approach is cloud cost engineering. They begin by analysing how organisations currently spend on CDN services and encoding setups, pinpointing unnecessary expenses. For example, they assess bitrate tier configurations and suggest encoding ladders that preserve viewer quality while cutting bandwidth usage, ultimately reducing costs.
One standout achievement? Hokstad Consulting has saved clients over £50,000 annually by employing a performance-based pricing model, where fees are capped as a percentage of the savings achieved.
For adaptive bitrate streaming, they also create dynamic adaptive caching strategies tailored to each client’s traffic patterns. This involves storing frequently accessed content closer to users, based on where the audience is located. The result? Lower bandwidth usage, reduced strain on origin servers, and significant cost reductions. Additionally, they negotiate improved CDN contracts by leveraging insights into traffic patterns and regional delivery needs, ensuring clients avoid unfavourable pricing agreements.
While these cost-saving measures are crucial, maintaining low latency is equally important for delivering high-quality streams.
Latency Reduction
Hokstad Consulting uses its multi-CDN expertise to cut latency through advanced DevOps techniques. They develop intelligent routing systems that automatically direct viewer requests to the best-performing CDN based on real-time factors like network conditions, location, and load distribution.
For the UK’s diverse network environment, they recommend combining multi-CDN setups with edge CDN deployment. This involves working with local infrastructure providers and strategically placing edge caching nodes to ensure efficient service delivery. By accounting for the differences between urban and rural network performance, they provide solutions that deliver consistent streaming quality regardless of the viewer’s location.
They also implement protocol upgrades, such as HTTP/2 and QUIC, to accelerate data transfer. Additionally, they use CMAF (Common Media Application Format) to reduce latency to under three seconds, enabling faster responses to network changes and ensuring smoother streaming experiences.
Scalability
Managing traffic surges during high-demand events requires infrastructure that scales without compromising performance. Hokstad Consulting designs auto-scaling systems with robust load balancing to maintain stable streams even during peak times. Their forward-thinking approach to cloud migration ensures that adaptive bitrate streaming systems are built on scalable foundations from the outset. This planning has led to a 95% reduction in downtime for their clients - an essential achievement for streaming services where interruptions can directly affect viewer satisfaction and revenue.
Their custom solutions also integrate seamlessly with multiple CDN providers, allowing organisations to distribute traffic efficiently across networks. This prevents any single provider from becoming overwhelmed during spikes in viewer numbers, ensuring uninterrupted streams and high-quality performance, even during unexpected demand surges.
Performance Monitoring
Hokstad Consulting doesn’t just stop at implementation - they also provide comprehensive performance monitoring systems. These systems track critical metrics like buffer levels, bitrate selection, viewer drop-off points, and regional performance variations. By analysing this data, they uncover opportunities for improvement, such as adjusting segment lengths or refining bitrate algorithms based on real viewer behaviour.
For multi-CDN setups, their monitoring tools evaluate performance across all providers simultaneously. This allows for smarter resource allocation and traffic management. Automated alerts are also set up to flag when a provider’s performance dips below acceptable levels, enabling traffic to be rerouted immediately to maintain service quality.
Hokstad Consulting enhances monitoring further with AI-driven solutions. They develop machine learning algorithms that analyse real-time network conditions, user behaviour, and device capabilities. These tools dynamically optimise bitrate selection and buffer management, improving the viewing experience while reducing bandwidth waste.
When transitioning clients from single-CDN to multi-CDN architectures, Hokstad Consulting follows a phased approach. They start with a detailed audit of current performance and costs, then introduce additional CDN providers gradually. Throughout this process, they monitor metrics and costs to ensure stability while delivering noticeable improvements in both quality and expense management.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Choosing between a single-CDN and a multi-CDN strategy involves balancing simplicity against resilience, with implications for streaming performance, complexity, and costs.
Single-CDN strategies prioritise simplicity, making them easier to manage. They come with unified monitoring dashboards and predictable billing, which can significantly reduce operational burdens for organisations with limited technical resources. When implemented effectively, single-CDN deployments can deliver strong performance. For example, strategically positioned edge servers can cut buffering delays by up to 4×, and optimised network routes can enhance playback reliability by as much as 40%[1].
That said, single-CDN setups have their drawbacks. They lack redundancy, which can lead to service disruptions during peak traffic loads[2]. Additionally, if the provider’s infrastructure is weaker in certain regions, viewers in those areas may experience subpar performance, regardless of how advanced your ABR algorithm might be.
Multi-CDN strategies tackle these challenges by offering better redundancy and failover options. If one CDN encounters issues, traffic can automatically shift to another provider, ensuring uninterrupted service[2]. Multi-CDN setups also deliver improved geographic coverage by leveraging the strengths of multiple providers’ edge networks, which helps minimise latency across different regions[2]. Intelligent routing further enhances performance by selecting the best CDN for each user, reducing latency and packet loss[6].
However, multi-CDN strategies come with their own set of challenges. While competition among providers can lower per-gigabyte costs, these savings may be offset by the administrative costs of managing multiple vendors, integrating billing systems, and maintaining redundant infrastructure. The operational complexity also increases, as organisations must monitor multiple vendors, implement intelligent routing, and ensure consistency across different platforms[2].
Another significant hurdle is configuration complexity. Managing different API standards, implementing routing logic, and maintaining consistent performance monitoring across CDNs require a robust technical setup and ongoing maintenance[1]. Security is another concern, as organisations need to ensure consistent policies, DRM compliance, and content protection across all providers.
Here’s a quick comparison of the two strategies:
| Metric | Single-CDN Strategy | Multi-CDN Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Latency Reduction | Strategic edge placement reduces buffering delays[1] | Improved through intelligent routing and provider selection[6] |
| Cost Savings | Predictable pricing and simpler vendor management | Competitive pricing, but higher administrative and integration costs |
| Scalability | Limited to one provider’s capacity; may struggle with traffic spikes[1] | Distributed load across providers, avoiding bottlenecks |
| Performance Monitoring | Unified dashboard for easy visibility | Requires aggregation across platforms, offering broader insights |
| Reliability | Route optimisation improves playback reliability[1] | Automatic failover eliminates single points of failure[2] |
| Management Complexity | Easier to implement and maintain | Requires more technical expertise and resources[2] |
Caching and monitoring also play a role in differentiating these strategies. Single-CDN systems use unified caching algorithms to predict and store popular content at edge locations[1]. On the other hand, multi-CDN setups may lead to content duplication unless carefully managed[1]. While single-CDN systems consolidate analytics into one platform, multi-CDN monitoring involves aggregating data from various providers, offering deeper insights into regional performance and specific issues.
Ultimately, the choice between single and multi-CDN strategies depends on your organisation’s needs, technical capabilities, and budget. Single-CDN approaches are ideal for those who value simplicity and predictable costs, while multi-CDN strategies suit organisations that prioritise reliability, global reach, and performance optimisation across different conditions. Selecting the right strategy ensures your streaming objectives align with your performance and cost goals, as previously discussed.
Conclusion
Selecting the right CDN strategy depends entirely on your organisation's goals, audience distribution, and technical resources. There's no one-size-fits-all solution - what works perfectly for a regional content provider may not be ideal for a large-scale broadcaster.
A single-CDN strategy can be a simple and effective choice, especially if your audience is concentrated in regions like the United Kingdom and Northern Europe. It’s particularly suitable for smaller streaming services, niche content providers, or organisations working with tighter budgets. With a single provider, you gain the advantage of streamlined monitoring, easier troubleshooting, and a centralised point of contact for support when issues arise[4].
On the other hand, multi-CDN strategies are indispensable for larger operations where reliability is non-negotiable. For instance, if you're broadcasting live sports or major events, the redundancy offered by multiple CDNs can help avoid disruptions. In cases of regional congestion, traffic can automatically switch to another provider, minimising buffering and ensuring a smooth viewing experience[4]. For organisations aiming to reach global audiences, a multi-CDN setup also provides broader geographical coverage, making it a strong choice for those with international ambitions[5].
When deciding on the right approach, consider factors like your audience's location, budget, technical expertise, uptime requirements, and future growth plans. For organisations planning to scale, starting with a multi-CDN strategy from the beginning can save significant effort compared to retrofitting it later. If you're based in the UK and using adaptive bitrate streaming, integrating CDNs effectively is critical to maintaining consistent video quality, even during network fluctuations. Additionally, real-time monitoring tools can help you address performance issues proactively[1]. For those prioritising environmental impact, evaluating the sustainability practices of CDN providers can also play a role in your decision-making process[1].
For organisations needing expert advice, consulting services can simplify this process. Hokstad Consulting, for example, specialises in cloud cost engineering and DevOps transformation. They can reduce CDN expenses by 30–50% without sacrificing performance. Their expertise in automation and custom development ensures your streaming infrastructure scales seamlessly as your audience grows, with ongoing support for monitoring and optimisation.
Ultimately, a successful CDN strategy strikes the right balance between performance, complexity, and cost. Start by understanding your audience's needs and your technical capabilities. From there, choose the approach that aligns best with your streaming goals and budget, ensuring a smooth experience for your viewers while keeping operations efficient.
FAQs
What are the main differences between using a single CDN and a multi-CDN approach for adaptive bitrate streaming?
A single-CDN strategy involves using just one content delivery network to distribute video content, whereas a multi-CDN approach utilises multiple networks to improve delivery efficiency. The main differences between the two come down to performance, reliability, and cost management.
Using a single CDN is generally easier to set up and maintain. However, it can face challenges with scalability or regional outages, which might impact user experience. On the other hand, a multi-CDN setup offers greater reliability by routing traffic through the most efficient network available. This can lead to better streaming quality and less buffering, especially during high traffic periods. That said, implementing a multi-CDN strategy can be more complex and demands close attention to costs to avoid overspending.
For businesses aiming to strike the right balance between performance and budget, fine-tuning CDN configurations is crucial. If you need tailored advice, Hokstad Consulting specialises in helping organisations optimise delivery while keeping expenses under control.
How does adaptive bitrate streaming lower costs while ensuring high video quality?
Adaptive bitrate streaming helps cut costs by tailoring video quality to match the viewer's internet speed and device capabilities. Instead of sending a high-quality stream that might not be necessary, it delivers just the right amount of data for smooth playback. This approach avoids wasting bandwidth and ensures a seamless viewing experience.
To make this even more efficient, you can fine-tune CDN configurations. This involves caching popular content and placing servers strategically closer to users. By doing so, you can reduce delays, improve performance, and lower operational costs by cutting down on data transfer and storage requirements - all while maintaining excellent video quality for your audience.
How does latency affect adaptive bitrate streaming, and what are the best ways to reduce it?
Latency is a key factor in adaptive bitrate streaming, as it directly influences how smooth the viewing experience is. When latency is too high, switching between video quality levels can lag, resulting in buffering or a drop in playback quality - particularly noticeable when network conditions are unstable.
To keep latency low, focus on optimising your CDN setup. Placing edge servers closer to your audience reduces the distance data has to travel. Using protocols like HTTP/2 or QUIC can also speed up data transfers. On top of that, adjusting buffer settings and segment sizes can help strike the right balance between video quality and responsiveness, ensuring a more seamless streaming experience.