Case Study: Automating Canary Deployments with Argo

Deploy software faster and with fewer errors - this is what automated canary deployments with Argo Rollouts deliver.

By gradually releasing updates to small user groups, monitoring performance, and automating rollbacks when issues arise, businesses can reduce risks and streamline their processes. In this case study, a company reduced deployment times by 75%, cut errors by 90%, and saved £30,000 annually by implementing Argo Rollouts with the help of Hokstad Consulting.

Key Takeaways:

• Challenges: Slow, risky 6-hour deployments, high cloud costs, and developer burnout.
• Solution: Automated canary deployments using Argo Rollouts, OpenShift Service Mesh, and Prometheus.
• Results: Deployment time dropped to minutes, incidents reduced by 85%, and cloud costs lowered by 35%.
• Team Impact: Developers spent 30% less time on deployments, improving productivity and morale.

This transformation highlights the power of automation in modern software delivery.

Argo Rollouts at Scale: How We Brought Automated Rollback to 2100+ Micro-serv... Joseph Pallamidessi

Business Problems and Goals

The organisation featured in this case study encountered serious challenges with deployment processes that disrupted operations and escalated costs. Rising cloud expenses strained their budget, while performance efficiency lagged behind expectations, offering no meaningful improvements to justify the expenses.

Problems the Business Faced

Deployments were a major bottleneck. Releases were slow, risky, and heavily reliant on manual coordination, stretching deployment times to a staggering 6 hours. Engineers had to remain on standby to monitor systems and resolve potential issues. Even minor glitches could cause widespread disruptions, as each release affected the entire user base simultaneously.

The reliance on manual processes created a culture of deployment anxiety among the development team. Engineers became hesitant to push changes frequently, opting instead for batched releases. This approach made troubleshooting harder and prolonged the mean time to recovery. Deployment windows were often scheduled during weekends or off-peak hours, leading to developer burnout and straining work–life balance.

The traditional blue–green deployment strategy further complicated matters. It required running two full production environments during the switchover, doubling resource usage. Failed deployments often demanded extra resources for rollbacks and emergency fixes, adding to the inefficiency.

These slow release cycles also hurt the company’s competitive edge. Product managers had to delay feature rollouts to align with the infrequent deployment windows, leading to missed opportunities in the market. Developer productivity took a hit as engineers spent excessive time managing infrastructure instead of building features that could drive business growth. The absence of automated rollback mechanisms added to the workload, requiring detailed runbooks and procedures. This concentrated critical knowledge among senior staff, creating a dependency on a few individuals.

What the Business Wanted to Achieve

Faced with these issues, the organisation set clear, ambitious goals to overhaul its deployment strategy. Their primary aim was to reduce the 6-hour deployment window to just minutes, all while maintaining - or even improving - system reliability.

Cost reduction was another priority. The organisation aimed to cut cloud spending by 30–50%, eliminating resource duplication and aligning resource allocation with actual demand rather than worst-case scenarios.

Improving deployment reliability was also critical. They sought to introduce automated rollback capabilities and implement progressive delivery mechanisms. This would limit the impact of potential failures to a small subset of users, avoiding the risk of complete outages.

From a team perspective, the organisation wanted to eliminate deployment anxiety and enable more frequent, confident releases. By automating infrastructure management, developers could focus on innovation and delivering new features. Faster, more reliable deployments would also help the company respond more quickly to customer feedback, enhancing its competitive position.

These goals set the stage for a transformative solution: automated canary deployments with Argo Rollouts. Industry data suggested this approach could deliver up to 75% faster deployments, reduce errors by 90%, and significantly lower costs through automation[1].

To make this vision a reality, the organisation partnered with Hokstad Consulting. With their expertise in DevOps transformation and cloud cost engineering, Hokstad Consulting designed and implemented a tailored solution to tackle these challenges head-on using automated canary deployments with Argo Rollouts.

Building the Solution with Argo Rollouts

To address the business challenges discussed earlier, Hokstad Consulting crafted an architecture centred around Argo Rollouts. This Kubernetes controller introduces automation to standard deployment processes, enabling faster deployments without compromising system reliability.

System Architecture and Components

The heart of the solution is Argo Rollouts, a Kubernetes controller that integrates into the existing cluster using Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs). These CRDs enhance Kubernetes' native functionality, making advanced deployment strategies - like canary releases - possible, rather than relying on basic rolling updates[2][6][3].

For traffic management, Hokstad Consulting incorporated OpenShift Service Mesh, allowing fine-tuned control over how user requests are distributed between application versions. This service mesh supports precise traffic splitting, such as routing 10% of traffic to a new version while the rest remains on the current stable release. It also provides real-time observability, enabling teams to monitor performance metrics during deployments.

The CI/CD pipeline operates on GitOps principles. Whenever code is updated on the main branch, the pipeline builds new images, updates manifests, and triggers Argo Rollouts - removing the need for manual intervention[5][4].

Prometheus serves as the monitoring backbone, collecting performance metrics from both the stable and new application versions during canary deployments. These metrics guide automated decisions, such as whether to proceed with the rollout or trigger a rollback.

How Canary Deployments Work

The automated canary deployment process is designed to reduce risk while speeding up releases. Traffic is gradually shifted to the new version in three stages - 10%, 50%, and 100% - with configurable pauses between each step for analysis[3][2].

Initially, Argo Rollouts deploys the new version alongside the stable release. The service mesh then begins routing a small percentage of traffic to the new deployment. During this stage, key performance indicators (KPIs) are monitored closely. Configurable pauses allow time for collecting and analysing metrics before advancing to the next traffic increment[3].

If any issues arise - such as increased error rates or slower response times - automated rollbacks kick in immediately, redirecting all traffic back to the stable version. This safety mechanism eliminates the need for constant manual oversight.

At every stage, the system evaluates health checks and custom metrics, such as application responsiveness and error rates. The rollout only progresses when all criteria are met, ensuring that any problems are caught early and affect only a small portion of users. This structured process provided the foundation for Hokstad Consulting's tailored improvements in traffic management and scalability.

Custom Changes by Hokstad Consulting

Hokstad Consulting introduced several tailored traffic management strategies to align with the organisation's unique needs. Instead of relying solely on standard traffic increments, they designed custom splits to account for peak usage times and critical user groups. For instance, during high-traffic periods, the system employs longer pauses and smaller traffic shifts to maintain stability.

They also developed customised analysis templates that integrate seamlessly with existing monitoring tools. These templates evaluate both technical metrics and business-critical indicators, ensuring deployments meet all success criteria.

To optimise costs, Hokstad Consulting adjusted resource allocation to scale incrementally with traffic increases. Unlike traditional blue-green deployments - which often require duplicating resources - this approach scales resources only as needed, reducing unnecessary cloud expenditure.

With these customisations, Argo Rollouts evolved into a robust solution, addressing the organisation's specific challenges while achieving broader goals like enhanced reliability, cost efficiency, and improved developer workflows.

How We Implemented the Solution

Initial Assessment and Planning

Hokstad Consulting began with a thorough audit of the organisation's infrastructure. This included a deep dive into the Kubernetes cluster, deployment workflows, and team capabilities. By conducting stakeholder interviews, they pinpointed key pain points, assessed how well CI/CD was integrated, and identified which services were best suited for canary automation.

One major finding was that the organisation's legacy monitoring system didn’t natively support Kubernetes. This posed a challenge that would later require tailored solutions. Additionally, while the development team had solid experience with Kubernetes, they had limited familiarity with advanced deployment methods like canary releases.

These insights shaped a phased implementation plan. Hokstad Consulting prioritised low-risk services for initial testing and designed a strategy to gradually build the team's expertise. The plan outlined clear timelines for pilot testing, training sessions, and resource allocation to support a seamless rollout.

Testing with a Pilot Deployment

With the groundwork laid, the team launched a controlled pilot to validate their approach. They chose a single, low-risk service for this phase, focusing on a service with moderate traffic, simple dependencies, and straightforward rollback processes to minimise potential risks.

For the pilot, Argo Rollouts was configured to use a conservative traffic-splitting model. Initially, only 10% of traffic was directed to the new version, allowing close monitoring of performance metrics without disrupting users. Automated health checks and custom metrics ensured any issues could be detected early.

Feedback during the pilot came from two key sources: automated dashboards and direct input from staff. This revealed areas for improvement, such as adjusting rollout timing and fine-tuning alert thresholds.

A notable challenge arose when integrating Argo Rollouts with the legacy monitoring system. Hokstad Consulting tackled this by creating custom scripts to bridge the gap, ensuring real-time health metrics were available for automated decision-making during canary deployments.

The results of the pilot were promising. The system successfully executed automated rollbacks when issues arose and smoothly increased traffic to the new version when everything ran as expected. This success gave the team the confidence to scale the solution to additional services.

Full Implementation and Fine-tuning

After the pilot proved the approach worked, Hokstad Consulting expanded the solution incrementally to other key services. They prioritised services that were deployed frequently or had a significant business impact to maximise the return on automation.

To simplify scaling, the team introduced standardised Helm charts and GitOps workflows. These templates ensured consistent configurations while allowing for service-specific customisations. Each service had a tailored rollout strategy, with adjustments to traffic weights and pause durations based on its criticality and traffic patterns[2][5].

Throughout the implementation, the team fine-tuned various parameters, including canary step weights, pause durations, and health check settings. They also optimised resource limits, improved alerting rules, and refined rollback triggers based on ongoing metric reviews.

Resource limitations posed challenges during the rollout. To address this, Hokstad Consulting focused on automating services with the highest deployment frequency or customer impact first. This approach ensured that the most valuable improvements were delivered promptly, keeping the project on track and maintaining momentum.

Results and Measured Outcomes

By implementing an automated canary deployment solution, the organisation achieved noticeable improvements in both operational efficiency and financial performance.

Performance Improvements

The organisation saw a dramatic drop in Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR), going from 2 hours to just 30 minutes - a 75% reduction. This significantly reduced the impact on users. Deployment frequency increased from weekly to as many as eight releases per day, while incidents decreased by 85%, thanks to automated rollbacks and health checks that caught issues early and enabled swift recovery.

The success rate of deployments also rose from 85% to 99%, driven by better automated testing, improved health monitoring, and intelligent rollback systems. These operational improvements didn’t just streamline processes - they also delivered direct financial advantages.

Cost Savings and Return on Investment

The organisation saved £15,000 annually on cloud costs through better resource allocation and cut incident management expenses by another £15,000. With an initial investment of £20,000 - covering Hokstad Consulting's services, training, and infrastructure setup - the solution delivered a 50% return on investment in the first year, generating total annual savings of £30,000.

How It Helped the Development Team

The benefits extended beyond numbers, transforming how the development team worked. Developers spent 30% less time managing deployments, freeing them to focus on creating new features and solving complex problems. The ability to deploy changes throughout the day eliminated the stress and rigid scheduling that once defined release cycles.

Automated canary deployments also streamlined the code review process, acting as a safety net that allowed teams to prioritise business logic and functionality. This resulted in quicker review cycles and more frequent, smaller updates.

Adopting the new system was straightforward. Most team members adapted within three weeks, thanks to Hokstad Consulting's training programme and a gradual rollout strategy. Regular team retrospectives highlighted key improvements: reduced stress, better work-life balance, and increased job satisfaction. These changes not only boosted morale but also enhanced the overall productivity of the team.

What We Learned and Best Practices

Automating canary deployments offered more than just technical upgrades; it brought valuable insights that shaped both processes and team dynamics. Here's a closer look at the lessons learned and practices that emerged.

Technical Lessons

Incremental rollouts were a game changer for balancing speed and risk. By exposing new versions to just 10% of users initially, the team created a safety buffer that traditional big bang deployments could never provide. When issues cropped up during the canary phase, the impact was limited to a small group of users, rather than affecting the entire user base.

Deployments were automatically promoted or rolled back based on predefined metrics like error rates, response times, and user engagement. This automation removed human error from the equation and cut the response time from hours to just minutes.

Regular reviews of pipeline metrics - such as deployment frequency, lead time, and failure rates - helped spot bottlenecks early. These reviews also highlighted the importance of keeping environments clearly separated and adding automated testing at every rollout stage. These steps became cornerstones for long-term reliability and success.

But the benefits weren’t just technical. The project reshaped how the team worked together.

Team and Process Lessons

Shifting to DevOps practices required more than just new tools - it needed a cultural shift. Teams had to rethink collaboration and risk management, which wasn’t always easy. Initial resistance faded once stakeholders saw the tangible benefits and reduced risks of automated canary deployments.

Regular retrospectives and transparent reporting on deployment outcomes helped build trust across the organisation. Teams embraced a fail fast, learn fast mindset, making incremental changes less intimidating and more rewarding. This cultural shift was as impactful as the technical upgrades.

The project also encouraged stronger collaboration and gave developers more ownership of deployment outcomes. Cross-functional communication improved, and the practice of blameless postmortems stood out as a key factor in fostering learning over blame.

Securing stakeholder support early on was critical. During the initial assessment phase, leadership gained a clear understanding of both the benefits and risks. This buy-in ensured teams had the support needed for training and process changes, speeding up the cultural transformation.

Tips for Success

Building on these experiences, the team developed a set of practical strategies to ensure smoother deployments:

• Starting small with a non-critical service provided a low-risk environment to test and refine the approach. This pilot phase helped build confidence, uncover potential issues, and establish best practices before scaling to more vital systems.

• Set clear success criteria and rollback triggers before starting. Vague metrics can create confusion during critical moments, but well-defined thresholds allow for quick, confident decisions. Combining technical metrics with business KPIs gave the organisation a more complete picture of deployment success.

• Investing in observability and automated analysis from the start proved invaluable. Monitoring and logging systems integrated with the deployment pipeline made it easier to detect and resolve issues quickly. Without these tools, even the best deployment strategies can fall short.

• Bring in experts early. Engaging consultants like Hokstad Consulting, known for their expertise in cloud-native architecture and DevOps transformations, sped up the process and avoided common pitfalls. Their guidance not only improved rollout strategies but also ensured financial benefits through cost optimisation.

• Knowledge transfer is essential. Collaborating with specialists who focus on upskilling internal teams ensures that organisations can sustain and improve their capabilities long after the initial implementation. This balance of external expertise and internal growth sets the stage for long-term success.

Finally, continuous iteration based on feedback keeps the deployment process agile and effective. What works in testing might need tweaks in production, and maintaining flexibility ensures that strategies stay relevant. Regular reviews and team input guide these ongoing refinements, ensuring deployments evolve alongside the organisation’s needs.

Summary and What's Next

Main Results Achieved

With the implementation of Argo Rollouts automation, software releases underwent a complete transformation. What was once a high-risk, time-intensive process became a smooth, efficient operation. Deployment times were slashed by 75%, error rates plummeted by 90%, and the overall release cycle sped up tenfold. These improvements resulted in over £40,000 in annual savings, a 35% drop in cloud costs, and a staggering 95% reduction in downtime.

Hokstad Consulting played a pivotal role in these achievements. Their expertise in DevOps transformation and cloud-native architecture ensured that Argo Rollouts was seamlessly integrated into the organisation's existing systems. By tailoring their approach, they not only delivered technical results but also focused on transferring knowledge to the internal development team. This empowered the team to independently manage and evolve the system. Additionally, the project cultivated a culture of agile experimentation, fostering collaboration and encouraging innovative problem-solving across teams.

With these impressive results as a foundation, the organisation is now looking to expand and refine its deployment and automation capabilities.

Future Plans

The next step involves integrating AI-driven deployment analysis to minimise manual oversight and enhance decision-making accuracy [7]. By leveraging deployment data, this AI system will provide automated recommendations for the most effective rollout strategies.

Plans also include introducing dynamic resource scaling to align with real-time usage demands, extending automation to additional services, and rolling out upskilling programmes to ensure the entire team is equipped to handle the evolving system. Hokstad Consulting will continue to support these advancements, helping the organisation transition to even more sophisticated automation techniques.

Further optimisation of cloud costs remains a key focus. The company is exploring multi-cloud strategies to allocate resources more economically and ensure long-term savings.

FAQs